Two More Federal Appeals Courts Reject Trump Policy That Seeks to Deny Access to Bond Hearings  

July 31, 2026 10:00 am

Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States

NEW YORK — Two more federal appeals courts this week rejected the Trump administration’s new policy subjecting millions of immigrants to mandatory detention without access to bond hearings.

Both the Ninth Circuit and Seventh Circuit issued July 30 decisions in American Civil Liberties Union lawsuits.

Read the Ninth Circuit ruling here.

Read the Seventh Circuit ruling here.

The rulings reflect similar decisions from four other federal appeals courts, as well as those issued by hundreds of district court judges who have found the policy unlawful.

For decades, immigrants in removal proceedings who were detained by the government have generally had the right to seek release through a bond hearing before an immigration judge. In mid-2025, the Trump administration suddenly adopted a new radical reinterpretation of the immigration laws and declared that anyone who entered without inspection must be detained without access to bond.

Among those who were affected were people who came as children and are eligible for legal status, even those with long-pending immigration applications who have been waiting years due to administrative backlogs.

“The courts have repeatedly ruled against the Trump administration’s radical reinterpretation of our country’s detention laws,” said My Khanh Ngo, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, who argued the Seventh Circuit appeal. “The law is clear: The administration can’t cruelly lock up people this way without giving them the basic due process of a bond hearing. Period.”

Related Issues