WA School Board Decides Not to Punish Student Web Site Hosts
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SEATTLE, WA — A suburban school board has decided not to impose restitution or community service on three Eastlake High School students who created a website on which someone else posted a death threat last fall, the American Civil Liberties said today.
The Board’s decision reverses the actions of Eastlake administrators and a district hearing examiner, who had recommended imposition of the sanctions. The action was announced in a letter from the school board received by the students’ parents today.
“The ACLU is pleased that the school district is no longer seeking to punish the students,” said Julya Hampton, Legal Program Director for the ACLU of Washington, which provided legal assistance to the students and parents in contesting the discipline.
“We believe that it is unfair for school officials to discipline students because of statements posted by others on their website. It is like going after the phone company for a threat made over the telephone.”
Last fall, the students established a website, including a chat room and bulletin board, as a way for other students at Eastlake High School in Redmond to talk about matters of interest to young people. Created on the students’ own time from home computers, the “Eaztlake Phantom” website developed into a lively forum for the discussion of issues ranging from eating disorders to homophobia. Some users also posted vulgar comments, though the Web masters discouraged this.
On November 1, 1999, the school was closed for a day after someone posted a death threat in the “Phantom’s” chat room. The Web masters contacted school officials to offer their help in identifying the threat’s author (who turned out to be a college student in Arizona) and voluntarily closed the chat room and bulletin board. School officials responded by imposing five-day suspensions on the three students and by seeking restitution of $500 each (or equivalent hours of community service) to cover a portion of the costs of security measures taken in the wake of the threat.
The students and their parents then contacted the ACLU, which provided legal representation as they contested the restitution before a district hearing examiner (who ruled against the students) and in a January appeal to the Lake Washington School Board.
“School officials are trying to scapegoat the website hosts for offensive statements and a threat made by other people. The school does not have the authority to impose discipline on students for speech outside of school and certainly not for providing a forum for free speech by others,” said Aaron Caplan, an ACLU of Washington Staff Counsel who is representing the students.
As a new generation of Web-wise youth takes freedom of expression into cyberspace, the ACLU is working to bring protections for student free speech to the Internet. In 1995, in a much-publicized case, the ACLU of Washington won an out-of-court settlement for Bellevue student Paul Kim after his principal disciplined him for creating a parody of his high school from a home computer. In an ACLU case in Missouri in 1998, a federal district court found that a school district had violated a student’s free speech rights when it suspended him for posting a personal Web page critical of his school. Currently pending is an ACLU of Washington lawsuit on behalf of a Thurston County high school student who was suspended for a month in 1999 for creating on his home computer a website lampooning his school’s vice-principal.
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
The Latest in Privacy & Technology
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About Privacy & Technology
The ACLU works to expand the right to privacy, increase the control individuals have over their personal information, and ensure civil liberties are enhanced rather than compromised by technological innovation.