Washington State Court Orders That All Votes Be Counted in Local Election

Affiliate: ACLU of Washington
December 18, 2003 12:00 am

ACLU Affiliate
ACLU of Washington
Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SEATTLE — Ruling in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington, King County Superior Court Judge James Doerty today ordered county election officials to count all ballots for a Medina City Council seat on which a candidate’s name is clearly written.

“The right to vote for the candidate of your choice is a fundamental part of our democracy. We’re pleased the court agreed that the intention of the voter should be honored,” said ACLU attorney Doug Klunder, who handled the case.

The ACLU lawsuit was filed on behalf of Katie Phelps, who waged a write-in campaign challenging incumbent Daniel Becker for a seat on the city council. The race was so close that King County election officials undertook a manual recount and found Becker ahead by three votes. Twenty-nine additional ballots had Phelps’s name clearly marked as a write-in but were declared invalid because voters failed to also darken the adjacent oval on the ballot. In today’s ruling, the court found that the decision not to count these votes was erroneous.

Officials had based their decision to discount the 29 write-in ballots on a provision of the state’s election law, amended in 1999, requiring voters using “optical-scan mark sense ballot systems” to fill in the oval for a write-in vote. Since the county did not use an optical scan system in the manual recount, the ACLU argued that the limitation should not apply. Further, the ACLU contended that constitutional principles require the counting of all ballots in which the voter’s intention is clear.

A longstanding principle of Washington case law (first articulated in State v. Fawcett, 1897) holds that, “All statutes tending to limit the citizen in the exercise of the right of suffrage should be liberally construed in his favor. ? The important thing is to determine the intention of the voter, and to give it effect.”

State law provides that “voters may write in on the ballot the name of any person for an office ? and such vote shall be counted the same as if the name had been printed on the ballot and marked by the voter.”

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release