Categories
Join Us At:
|
Utter Contempt
Today's a big day in Tape Destruction World.
We're headed to court at 3:00 p.m. to argue that the CIA acted in contempt of court when it destroyed hundreds of hours of videotape depicting the harsh treatment of two detainees in its custody. The CIA neglected to mention the existence of the tapes, and ultimately decided to destroy them in 2005, despite an order from a federal judge to produce or identify all records pertaining to - that's right - the treatment of detainees in its custody. We'll also be arguing for the release of other government documents relating to the abuse of prisoners, including Office of Legal Counsel memos authorizing the CIA and the Defense Department to use harsh interrogation methods, documents relating to the CIA Office of Inspector General investigations into prisoner abuse and Defense Department videotapes believed to depict "Forced Cell Extraction" teams abusing Guantanamo prisoners. In D.C., Acting General Counsel to the CIA John Rizzo is scheduled to testify in a closed-door House Intelligence Committee hearing on the destruction of the tapes. And in the interest of instilling a measure of independence from the Justice Department not likely with the Durham investigations, the ACLU is reiterating its call for an independent special counsel to investigate not only the destruction of the interrogation tapes but also the underlying acts of detainee abuse they most likely depict. Let's hope today brings reminders of what checks and balances - and meaningful oversight - should look like.
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 1 Response to "Utter Contempt" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Aug 21st, 2008 at 7:45am
What about all of the American civilians that warned the FBI about terrorists recruiting within the states 3 years before 9/11?
Why don't you talk about us?