www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Jun 10th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by Natasha Minsker, Death Penalty Policy Director, ACLU of Northern California at 12:31pm

A Better Way to Balance the Budget—and Protect Public Safety

A series of common sense, waste-cutting proposals would address two of California's biggest problems: our overburdened, dysfunctional corrections system, and the ever increasing multibillion dollar deficit. Implementing these proposals would save the state $7.5 billion in five years and improve public safety, so what are we waiting for?

Over the last 20 years, California's corrections budget has increased by 450 percent. What are we spending all of that money on?

  • We pay over $380 million every year to lock up over 1,600 young people in youth prisons, even though local programs have proven cheaper and more effective at rehabilitating
  • We waste billions of dollars each year to lock up thousands of nonviolent drug offenders even though community-based treatment is cheaper and actually gets people off drugs
  • We throw away hundreds of millions of dollars each year on the largest, most dysfunctional death penalty system in the country even though permanent imprisonment is cheaper and just as effective

Here are three simple proposals to trim the waste and improve our corrections system.

  • Close the Division of Juvenile Justice Facilities—Save $1 Billion in Five Years (Proposed by Books Not Bars Initiative of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights and the Center for Juvenile and Criminal Justice)

    California taxpayers currently pay an outrageous $234,000 to incarcerate each youth in Division of Juvenile Facilities (DJF), or $380 million total each year. Transferring all 1,624 young people to programs administered by county probation departments and closing the decrepit DJF would allow the state to provide $115,000 per youth to county programs and still save $200 million each year. The counties have enough room to house the young people, and still maintain a surplus of beds.

    Additional savings would come from avoiding expensive renovations needed to the dismal juvenile prisons and by the selling state land they currently sit on.

    Act now: Call for an end to the Division of Juvenile Justice!
  • Keep the Response to Petty Drug Possession Local—Save $5.5 Billion in Five Years (Proposed by Drug Policy Alliance)

    The biggest bulk of cash — $5.5 billion — can be saved by localizing the response to low-level drug offenses. This proposal would reduce the burden thousands of simple drug possession offenders now place on the state's public safety infrastructure, and free up resources for effective rehabilitation.

    We can save an astounding $5.5 billion in five years if we take three simple steps:

    • Stop housing 12,000 people in prison for simple drug possession to save $2.5 billion.
    • Stop sending people to prison for drug possession with intent to sell to save an additional $2.5 billion.
    • End parole for people convicted of drug possession who have already served their time in state prison to save $675 million in 5 years.

    Removing these nonviolent drug offenders from our state corrections system will allow us to keep critical funding for the state's addiction treatment programs which prevent reoffending and ultimately strengthen public safety.

    Act now: Demand an end to wasteful drug war spending!
  • Convert Death Sentences to Permanent Imprisonment—Save $1 Billion in Five Years (Proposed by the ACLU Affiliates of California)

    It currently costs California $137 million annually to administer the death penalty. The alternative — permanent imprisonment for all 680 inmates on death row— would cost the state $11 million a year. By converting all current death sentences to sentences of life without possibility of parole, the state will save approximately $125 million each year, or $600 million in five years.

    Additionally, temporarily suspending new death sentences for five years will eliminate the need to construct a new death row facility, saving about $400 million.

    Any attempt to "speed up" or "fix" the death penalty will only cost millions more, so the only way to both save money and protect public safety is to suspend the death penalty and convert all death sentences to permanent imprisonment.

    Act now: Sign the petition calling on Gov. Schwarzenegger to convert all death sentences to save $1 billion in five years.

These proposals are not only aimed at cutting wasteful spending; they are designed to improve public safety, bolster youth and drug rehabilitation programs that do work, and advance the long-needed adjustments to the California corrections system. The bottom line is California can save $7.5 billion in five years and improve public safety.

— By Zachary Norris, Books Not Bars Director at the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights; Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, Drug Policy Alliance Deputy State Director, Southern California; and Natasha Minsker, ACLU of Northern California Death Penalty Policy Director

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

7 Responses to "A Better Way to Balance the Budget—and Protect Public Safety"

  1. Paen Says:

    Good start but soft drugs should be simply legalized.

  2. admin Says:

    just running a test

  3. wild Says:

    What are we waiting for? What are we spending all that money on?

    ~2 very serious questions that the politicians love to change the focus away from!

    With arnoldish tempertamptrums, and whining, the focus is once again being distracted with 'fabulous Savings'.

    It sounds so nice.

    Haven't you heard, that for every felon head incarcerated is equalstat with $350,000/yr. for the machine. YEAH, THAT WHAT YOUR WORTH TO THEM~ ON THE INSIDE.

    When there is a ransom like that on the head of ANYONE they can intern, then 'waiting on savings' becomes systematically unobtainable.

    Jumping at these kinds of 'savings' is simply another well placed Republican sales gimmick ~to distract.

    Look at it like this..do you think the good governor is going to suggest pay cuts for all those prison administration personel in charge of 'death row inmates'...or paycuts for the cops, lawyers, judges, wardens, parole officers, parole boards, etc.

    You wanna get a smile out of arnold? Just whisper in his ear 'gitmo high value detainee'~~the worth to his machine~~heck there isn't a republican alive that isn't NEGOTIATING FOR that kind of big money!

    Its and old NEGOTIATING ploy~~ to claim 'NO ONE IN THE WHOLE UNITED STATES WANTS THESE HIGH VALUE DETAINEES ON AMERICAN SOIL'...(even tho everyone knows the detainees are headed to 'justice' states side)but you will see them change their tune when they get the monetary level up high enough, and then some Red state will ever so subtily become 'warm and fuzzy' about the prospect of incarcerating individuals from far off lands.

    Next time your local politician sells you 'Savings'.........think of it like a car sales man selling you 'Savings'.

    wild;)

  4. Steve Says:

    Paen, legalizing drugs solves nothing. There are those who argue that since alchohol is legalized, drugs should be too. As one who transports school-children for a living I would hate to have a youngster's life ended simply because the driver was under the influence. That stuff stays in your system for about 30 days, not the mention the consequences of addiction. If I need a fix, and I need it NOW, and I have no money to get high.....well,you know the rest.

  5. roald Says:

    Steve, I agree that people in positions of responsibility should not be under the influence when performing those duties. Some observations...

    - People who transport school children are not allowed to drink before driving and would not be allowed to use soft drugs.

    - Presence in your body is not the same as being under the influence.

    - The need for a "fix" does not exist when non-addictive drugs are used. This means people are not out committing crimes to buy them.

  6. coolmetoo Says:

    if the ACLU would quit fighting for medical merijuana rights. it would save the tax payers millions after finding out that most of this is paid for by tax payers and or welfare office . bad ACLU

  7. drug rehab Says:

    thanks for sharing this valuable resource and Sober College is an Exclusive Drug Rehab Center. We Provide Alcohol and Drug Treatment. Intervention Services for Alcohol Addiction, Whether to prevent your child from using alcohol, tobacco or other drugs.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image