www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Oct 1st, 2009
Posted by Christopher Hill, Capital Punishment Project at 4:39pm

ACLU Highlights Flaws in American Capital Punishment

In his continuing effort to bring to light human rights issues in the United States before an international stage, Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU Human Rights Program, made a statement about the capital punishment system at the Human Dimension Implementation Meeting (HDIM) of the Organization for Security and Cooperation of Europe (OSCE) in Warsaw, Poland. Jamil discussed the human rights violations that plague the death penalty system in the United States and highlighted several issues including the danger of executing the innocent, noting:

We have long been afraid that an innocent person has been executed in the United States. Those fears have become reality. Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in 2004 for the arson-murder of his three children. Independent investigations by a newspaper and a nonprofit organization using top experts in the field of fire science found that arson was not the cause of the fire. The State of Texas hired a fire expert to investigate. But even the state's distinguished expert found that the fire was not intentionally set. All of this leads to one conclusion. Cameron Todd Willingham was executed for a crime he almost certainly did not commit.

The risk of executing more innocent people was evident in the fact that five men were released from death row in four different states in 2009. This number is staggering when you consider the amount of time these men spent in prison for crimes they did not commit, and that there were people allowed to actually get away with murder because others were incarcerated and sentenced to death for their crimes. The death penalty does not make people living in the U.S. any safer; in fact, it only increased the suffering of the wrongfully convicted and the victims' families.

In addition to the problems of the state killing innocent people, Jamil also discussed other problems with capital punishment such as judicial misconduct in Texas. Philip Alston, U.N. Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions, noted in a report released last May that Texas's death penalty is problematic for several reasons, including the system of judicial elections.

 

Jamil also highlighted the horrendous problems associated with the main method of carrying out executions in the United States, lethal injection. He mentioned the recent botched execution of a man in Ohio. The attempt to execute Rommel Broom took two hours and the governor finally had to issue a reprieve.

The ACLU was not the only organization calling for abolition. The European Union also made a statement urging the states attending the conference to abolish the death penalty (PDF). In its presentation, the European Union called on the only countries in the OSCE area that execute people, namely the U.S. and Belarus, to impose a moratorium on capitol punishment. The conclusion that must be drawn is that capital punishment in the U.S. needs to be abolished.

Learn more about the ACLU's work on capital punishment at: /capital/index.html

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

3 Responses to "ACLU Highlights Flaws in American Capital Punishment"

  1. Steve Says:

    The ACLU views the death penalty as "cruel and unusual" punishment but yet when a suction device is stuck in the back in an unborn child's skull and their brains are sucked out that-according to the ACLU-is neither cruel nor unusual. Commit a serious crime, you get this organization's blessing, but if you are simply concieved, well that's another story.

  2. Ivanka Says:

    ACLU do great job, because the man is the worst animals in planet. Nobody have a right to kill somedy.

  3. Anonymous Says:

    So if no one has the right to kill somebody then the one's who dedide to do that very thing should have the right to be placed in a cell where the tax payers pay their way through life? Or what about the families of the one's who have been murdered or molested? Should they have to sit around and watch the murders be able to live? There really are no good answer's to these questions. We could sit here and debate the death penalty all day and not get anywhere. The just of it is murdering is not right for anyone ut also it is not right for the ones who commited the crime to go unpunished either.

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image