CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Fighting to Fund a Fair Defense
Newsweek reported Wednesday that the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council has run out of money defending one client: Brian Nichols. The capital case, which carries the potential for a death sentence, has ground to a halt while the state can get together more money to pay Nichols' lawyers, who have been working for free since the money ran out.
It's an issue that's cropping up across the country. Judges in different states have intervened in death-penalty cases because many states have refused to underwrite the cost of a constitutionally adequate defense, according to John Holdridge, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Capital Punishment Project. "The problem is that politically it's a very unpopular cause - the defense of people accused of crimes," Holdridge says. "Politicians are constantly clamoring that they believe in the death penalty, but they refuse to pay for a fair system." The states that are quickest to shepherd convicts into the execution chamber are also among those with the lowest-paid public defenders, Holdridge maintains. "Lawyers in most death-penalty states would be lucky to get a third of $165 [an hour]," he says, citing the standard pay for defense lawyers working in federal court (which is at the top end of the public-defense pay scale). "You get the defense you pay for."The Georgia State Public Defender's Office was in the news last month when its director, Christopher Adams, quit because the office wasn't able to properly represent death row defendants with its limited budget. Under-funding is especially prevalent in "death belt" states like Texas, Oklahoma and Alabama. And just Thursday, the New Mexico Supreme Court suspended the prosecution of a death penalty case until more funds were made available to pay the defendants' attorneys a reasonable hourly wage. In his opinion in State of New Mexico v. Young and Lopez, Judge Edward Chavez found the defense team's compensation insufficient, "violating the defendants' Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel." This isn't the last you'll hear of the "no more money" problem.
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.