Supporter of Capital Punishment Calls for Life Without Parole as Ultimate PunishmentJoseph Tydings has a long history with the death penalty. He is a former United States Attorney for Maryland, United States Senator for Maryland, member of the Judiciary Committee of the Senate, prosecutor of capital cases and counsel to a capital defendant who was executed in Virginia. In his recent commentary in The Baltimore Sun, "No Fatal Mistakes," focusing on the hearings of the Maryland Commission on Capital Punishment, Sen. Tydings notes his "deep concerns about the failures in our criminal justice system in capital cases." Sen. Tydings is profoundly concerned about the risk of executing an innocent person. And he believes he speaks from personal experience. He used to represent Walter Correll, who was executed in 1996 for a crime that Sen. Tydings still believes he didn't commit. (Correll was also mentally retarded and, six years too late for him, in 2002 the United States Supreme Court declared the death penalty a disproportionate penalty for those living with mental retardation.) Sen. Tydings is also concerned about the failure of death penalty states such as Maryland to provide defendants with competent counsel and a fair trial as mandated by the United States Constitution. And, again, he has good reason to be concerned: each year for the last 36 years an average of three demonstrably innocent persons has been condemned to death in the United States. Sen. Tydings concludes his remarkable commentary: "The penalty for conviction in capital cases should be changed to life imprisonment without the possibilityof parole until we are willing or able to provide the resources to stop these frightfully tragic miscarriages of justice."
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 5 Responses to "Supporter of Capital Punishment Calls for Life Without Parole as Ultimate Punishment" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Sep 3rd, 2008 at 3:39pm
Haven't the advances in forensic sciences lowered the number of innocent people on death row? And what does it mean ''demonstrably innocent''? I am an ACLU member but not entirely persuaded by the arguments against capital punishment.
Sep 10th, 2008 at 2:40pm
So I guess we'll pay for it to keep these people alive that basically serve no purpose other than to kill innocent civilians.
Oct 22nd, 2008 at 12:22pm
i be;ieve if you take i life your life should be taking
Oct 22nd, 2008 at 12:23pm
peter is right
Oct 22nd, 2008 at 12:24pm
hi my name is gonechiway