www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONDONATEABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU

Join Us At:

Oct 6th, 2008 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook
Posted by John Holdridge, Director, Capital Punishment Project at 12:50pm

Troy Davis Case Proves Death Penalty Is Fatally Flawed

The U.S. death penalty system is a failed government program unworthy of a people that cherish fairness and justice. If we needed any further proof of this fact, the Troy Davis case seals the deal.

On September 23, 2008, Troy Davis came within two hours of being executed. He was at least temporarily saved when the United States Supreme Court granted a last-minute stay to give it time to decide whether to review his case. But Troy is not out of the woods. If the Supreme Court decides not to take his case, he will once again face execution.

Troy Davis has steadfastly maintained his innocence for all of the many years he has been imprisoned on Georgia's death row. An African-American, Davis was convicted of the murder of a white, off-duty Savannah Police Officer named Mark MacPhail in 1991. Not a shred of physical evidence links him to the crime. No murder weapon has been found. Nine non-police witnesses testified against him at trial, but all but two of these witnesses have either recanted their testimony or gave contradictory statements prior to Troy's trial. Some of the recanting witnesses now assert that they were coerced by police to say that Davis was the murderer. One of the witnesses who did not recant was seen acting suspiciously the night of Officer MacPhail's murder and has been heard boasting that he killed an off-duty police officer.

As extraordinary as it seems, despite the collapse of the case against Troy Davis, and despite the pleas on Troy's behalf by such leading figures of moral authority as Pope Benedict XVI, former president Jimmy Carter and Nobel Peace Prize-winner Desmond Tutu (PDF), the State of Georgia still wants to execute him.

This deeply troubling case illustrates four truths about our capital punishment system.

First, it is fraught with error. In the past 35 years, 130 innocent death row inmates have been exonerated and released after years on death row, and eight men have been executed even though there were serious questions about their guilt. In other words, the system can't reliably determine who is guilty, let alone who deserves the death penalty. And, despite popular myths, DNA is no panacea to the scourge of wrongful convictions and executions. It is available in only 10 percent of all murder cases.

That's Troy Davis' biggest problem. He cannot convince some death penalty supporters that he is innocent because there is no DNA evidence available to conclusively exclude him as the culprit. These supporters of capital punishment defend his conviction and death sentence by citing the flimsy evidence presented at his trial. But then they turn around and demand that Troy Davis prove his innocence with unassailable, irrefutable evidence.

That's not how our capital punishment system should work. When it comes to the death penalty, innocence should never have to be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. We must not execute a human being if there is any legitimate chance that he is innocent.

Second, our judicial system can no longer monitor and control the use of capital punishment. Courts and legislators have made it so difficult for death-row inmates to challenge their convictions and death sentences that the system is unable to correct its own mistakes. It has become like an 18-wheeler barreling down a mountain, with no run-off lanes to stop it.

Third, the death penalty is infected by economic discrimination. It's a poor man's penalty. It is about poor people receiving death sentences because their lawyers were too overworked and underfunded to properly represent them.

Some politicians love to go around proclaiming their support for capital punishment but then they turn around and refuse to pay for a fair system. Capital defenders are given grossly inadequate time and resources to adequately defend their clients. We are seeing that again today with the funding crisis in Georgia's system of providing lawyers for poor people. Fourth, the death penalty discriminates on the basis of race. Study after study in state after state, including Georgia, has demonstrated that, everything else being equal, a defendant is about three to four times more likely to get a death sentence if he kills a white person than if he kills a person of color. And the combination most likely to get the death penalty is a black defendant convicted of killing a white victim.

As former Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun declared: “race continues to play a major role in determining who shall live and who shall die.”

In short, the Troy Davis case is a no brainer. The State of Georgia must not execute him. After all, as Justice Blackmun also once said, the execution of an innocent man comes perilously close to murder.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg! Reddit Delicious Facebook

Tags: Troy Davis

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

5 Responses to "Troy Davis Case Proves Death Penalty Is Fatally Flawed"

  1. John Says:

    We need to boycott the state, and all businesses in Georgia to stop this killing!

  2. richard Says:

    This story among others are very very one sided and do not present a fair argument. When reporting a story it is professional to at least provide both sides of the story...not just one side like the ACLU does constantly.

  3. Johnny Justice Says:

    He's guilty. Why do you defend a murderer? There are better things to do with your life.
    http://www.markallenmacphail.com/Inconsistent.htm
    I hope you burn in hell.

  4. Jack Morris Says:

    State sponsored murder solves nothing. There is no evidence that capital punishment serves to satisfy anything other than the brutally vengeful motives of its supporters and the needs of opportunistic politicians and jurists. Give peace a chance. Stop the carnage now!

  5. Sade McNeal Says:

    October 29,2008
    Dear ACLU,
    I am astonished at the way that capital punishment is being dealt with around United States. I can't believe that innocent people lives are being taken away from them because of others not taking the time to do their jobs the proper way. It is depressing just thinking of the fact that a father,mother, or someones best-friend can be sitting on death row right now and they are innocent. Their are others that are for death penalty and they feel that a criminal deserves maximum punishment for certain crimes. But even they are now questioning the system and finding it very difficult to endorse something so unfair and unjust.
    Under no circumstances will I ever endorse the killing of another human being no matter what crime they committed. We all can agree if there were better lawyers and judges and a new system of justice, it might be understandable in some cases for a person to possibly face death or maybe if they just requested it themselves. I am a true supporter for your effort to create a moratorium on further executions. Death row is not the answer on rehabilitating criminals or to even set an example for another crook. We need to execute the legal system that we use, then fairness would prevail.
    Sincerely,
    Sade McNeal

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
 

Quicksearch


© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image