Blog of Rights: Official Blog of the American Civil Liberties Union » This Week's Top Snitch Scandals: "I Was Trying to Create a Snitch"

www.aclu.org JOIN THE ACLU TAKE ACTION DONATE ABOUT US

ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office

Join Us At:

Nov 17th, 2007
Posted by Anjuli Verma, Drug Law Reform Project at 12:25pm	Drug Law Reform

This Week's Top Snitch Scandals: "I Was Trying to Create a Snitch"

Check out a few stories that have hit the headlines over the past week. They are just a snapshot of the injustices that occur every day in America when known criminals work as informants to do the work police should be doing:

The Associated Press reported this past week that while one South Carolina police department was paying an informant to participate in drug deals, another local sheriff's department was expending resources to bust the same informant for committing the very same drug offenses! After the informant was caught in the sheriff's sting, the informant accused several sheriff deputies of beating him and breaking his teeth by shoving a shotgun barrel in his mouth. Even though a state agency cleared the deputies of the beating, it does not appear that anyone is looking into how to keep law enforcement agencies from working against one another when it comes to informants.
The San Antonio Express News reported that Texas' highest criminal appeals court issued a decision that, in effect, allows police officers to give illegal drugs - even when the drugs are evidence in a case - to informants for their personal use! In this case, a police officer caught the potential informant with drugs, but before booking the evidence in her case he gave some of the drugs back to her so she could get high. The officer's defense to the tampering-with-evidence charge? "I was trying to create a snitch."
The Asbury Park Press reported that a New Jersey police officer was accused of regularly having sex with a married informant, and at least once brutally raping her, which resulted in her bearing his child. The informant has accused the police department of permitting and encouraging police officers to sexually harass and have sex with female informants and other women they encounter while on duty. The Mayor proclaimed “no wrongdoing," and the police officer who fathered the informant's child is back on patrol - apparently with a free pass to “work with" informants.
The Daily Southtown News in Illinois reported this past week that an informant was sent to prison for fraud, impersonating an FBI agent and lying to federal authorities. The informant fraudulently schemed to extort money from several individuals, and when one of his victims refused to give him money, he reported him to the FBI and claimed that he was a terrorist! Unfortunately, the Illinois State Police, the FBI, and the DEA all used this paid informant for years to convict people and put them in prison. Even though the informant was convicted of falsely accusing people, it does not appear that anyone is looking into whether innocent people are in prison today because of his lies during his years as a supposedly “reliable" informant.
The Ledger-Enquirer in Georgia reported last week that after an informant drew narcotics officers into a deadly shootout where they killed a civilian, the informant's testimony will determine whether the police are in fact liable for the killing. Unfortunately, the informant has changed his story too many times to know what actually happened. First he denied that he worked as an informant in the past. Then he said he had. He then denied knowing specific things about the drug supplier that was being investigated. He later said he did. He then said the drug supplier was armed and dangerous. Later he said he was not. How can we make such life-and-death decisions without requiring that information from informants be corroborated?

The way our government uses informants is so ripe for abuse even law enforcement officers and courts aren't capable of finding the truth anymore. Whether each of these cases is the police officer's fault or the informant's fault - or both - one thing is clear: our nation's informant system is broken.

The ACLU is working with lawyers, elected officials and in the community to promote awareness and to ask for accountability measures such as corroboration of information from informants, and reliability hearings to test the credibility of informants. You can help us out by reporting any experience you've had with the use of informants in your community by filling out this story collection form.


Permalink \|	Drug Law Reform

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

1 Response to "This Week's Top Snitch Scandals: "I Was Trying to Create a Snitch""

gangstalking Says:
Dec 24th, 2008 at 7:40pm
The Informant system is more than broken, it's corrupt from the top to the bottom. Yet paid and unpaid informants are used for foot patrols and vehicle patrols when people are under covert investigation. (Keep in mind someone could be under a covert investigation, based on the word of a snitch.)

Second these sometimes less then honest or ethical individuals are used and paid to move into the apartments or if possible homes around those that are under covert investigation. These people are used to monitor them, and in the case of Gang Stalking, harass, gaslight, frame, and make to appear as mentally unstable. Yet there is nothing being done.

The system is corrupt and does need to be fixed, sooner rather than later.

Quicksearch

ACLU Affiliate Blogs

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Categories

This Week's Top Snitch Scandals: "I Was Trying to Create a Snitch"

1 Response to "This Week's Top Snitch Scandals: "I Was Trying to Create a Snitch""

Quicksearch

Recent Entries

ACLU Affiliate Blogs