|
|
"Give Us Our Books, Don't Treat Us Like Crooks" So went the call for change on the steps of New York City Hall. On October 22, folks from the New York Civil Liberties Union and I participated in a rally at City Hall to raise public awareness about and garner support for the Student Safety Act. The rally was attended by over 100 high-school youth active in the Urban Youth Collaborative, a network of community organizations committed to ending overpolicing in New York City public schools and ensuring that our schools are safe places of learning for everybody. Unfortunately, overpolicing in public schools is hardly limited to New York City schools. The school-to-prison pipeline—a term given by advocates to the convergence of harsh disciplinary policies and reliance on police in schools that pushes children out of educational environments and into the juvenile justice system—is a growing problem all over the country. The brisk autumn weather was a perfect backdrop for a rally that was deeply moving and energizing for everyone involved. After things wound down, I had the chance to talk with 18-year-old Jaritza Geigel, a recent graduate from the Bushwick School for Social Justice, and a speaker at the rally. Jaritza shared her experience with police in her school and performed an original piece of spoken-word poetry. In anticipation of the November 10 hearing on the Student Safety Act, I asked Jaritza to contribute to the Blog of Rights about what the Student Safety Act means to her: For as long as I can remember, school has always felt like the safest place besides my home. As I grew older, I felt the same way about school until I started to attend a school with metal detectors, scanning, gated windows, and overpolicing. Urban Youth Collaborative is made up of five core organizations: Desis Rising Up and Moving, Future of Tomorrow of Cypress Hills Local Development Corporation, Make the Road New York, Sistas and Brothas United of The Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition, and Youth on the Move of Mothers on the Move. Tags: stpp
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 6 Responses to ""Give Us Our Books, Don't Treat Us Like Crooks"" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Nov 6th, 2009 at 2:52pm
It is really a shame that schools have to have this kind of monitoring. However this happens all over the country. If these children (and I suppose the parents are involved?) don't want the police etc there. Then by all means take them out of schools. Just remember when the first child is hurt don't start complaining that police should be in the schools.
Nov 6th, 2009 at 3:46pm
If there was no crime in the school, there would be no need for the presence of law-officers in our places of secondary learning. Metal-detectors are needed in the doorways for a reason, because of the weapons that are smuggled in by gang-members. If strong-disipline were brought back into the schools, and if teachers and staff were allowed to disipline un-ruley students without a threat of an ACLU lawsuit, police in our hallways would be a thing of the past. The far-left feels kids should have the right to do as they please without consequence, which will NOT prepare them for the real world when (or if) they graduate.
Nov 7th, 2009 at 2:16pm
Ah. The usual mythologists, RIGHT on schedule! The shaddup, get a haircut and stand in line brigade has spawned several generations since Kent State and learned nothing whatsoever in the process.
Nov 8th, 2009 at 10:09pm
As someone who used to be special needs, I just know that these cops are targeting special needs kids. These cops get zero training on how to deal with kids, particularly those on the spectrum.
What you people don't seem to understand at all is that the cops get to do whatever they want to the students without ANY transparency. If you're going to have cops in the schools, at the very least, they need to be held accountable. Otherwise, students will feel threatened by said cops and will be that less likely to talk to them.
Kids are people. Thus, they have the same rights to, say, not being violently assaulted (including by adults) and free expression and all that jazz. Oh btw Steve, there are other and more effective ways to discipline kids than beating them or whatever else you mean by "strong discipline". It's not an all-or-nothing situation.
Nov 9th, 2009 at 2:40pm
Actualy Steve there was a program in Europe that strongly encouraged discipline in youth and many people like yourself were greatly impressed and wanted to bring something similar to America.This program encouraged hiking ,sports and above all patriotism.
That program was the Hitler Youth.
Nov 9th, 2009 at 8:30pm
It doesn't seem fair to me that these students are being treated as criminals. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? I understand the obligation schools have to provide safe learning environments, but I believe that this amount of security would be a distraction for students. I think the Student Safety Act is a good idea and an excellent way to have a "checks and balances" system so the security is fair and doesn't get out of hand.