CategoriesJoin Us At:
|
Gitmo Hold 'EmA day after a federal district judge in Washington ordered the government to release a group of 17 Chinese Muslims held at Guantánamo Bay, a federal appeals court blocked their release to the U.S. The three-judge panel granted a government request for more time to argue against the release of the Uighurs, despite the fact that the government has already deemed the men as "no longer enemy combatants" (which is Bush-speak for "innocent." That's right: innocent). Also documents obtained by Yale's Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic and the ACLU through the Freedom of Information Act, disclosed this week the government's extension of standard operating procedures developed for Guantánamo to individuals labeled "enemy combatants" being held in the U.S. for years without charge. These measures include the use of prolonged isolation, painful stress position, extreme sensory deprivation, and threats of violence and death in an attempt to create a miniature Guantánamo at home. Valtin frames both issues within the context of the Supreme Court decision preserving the right of men held at Guantánamo Bay to pursue habeas challenges to their detention. He writes: It's hard to believe the DC court thought it had any leg to stand on, given that the Supreme Court last June ruled unconstitutional the provision of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 that suspended the use of habeas corpus by detainees in Bush's "war on terror." Passage of the MCA is one of the great shames of this nation…Repeal of this law should be one of the first priorities of the next Congress. The new ACLU documents, revealing how torture treatment abroad migrated to the United States, and then its use on U.S. citizens, demonstrate how slippery is the slope that leads from so-called national security exigency to the destruction of basic domestic civil liberties.It is clear that our lame duck president and his cronies won't go down quietly (White House press secretary Dana Perino stated that the administration was "deeply concerned by, and strongly disagrees with" the release of the Uighurs which "if allowed to stand, could be used as precedent for other detainees held at Guantánamo Bay"). This administration's detention policies are a failure, they don't keep us safe or free, and have denigrated the U.S. in the eyes of the world. We are hopeful that the next administration won't continue these wrongheaded policies and will help restore our country to the defender of human rights we once used to be.
Tags: constitutionvoter, national security project
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 2 Responses to "Gitmo Hold 'Em" |
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Oct 9th, 2008 at 2:46pm
its really unfortunate. there has been so little good news during the past 8 years and the news of the release of the Uighurs was finally a reason to cheer. this decision is a huge setback and it only further indicts the Bush adminstration as the war criminals that they really are.
good post. blog on!
Nov 15th, 2008 at 5:45pm
No person shall be held to answer for a capital or infamous crime,unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury,EXCEPT IN CASES ARISING IN THE LAND OR NAVAL FORCES,OR IN THE MILITIA,WHEN IN ACTUAL SERVICE IN TIME OF WAR AND PUBLIC DANGER.Nor are those held at Gitmo protected under the geneva convention perhaps the ACLU neglected to read the Bill of RIGHTS or the Geneva convention as it conflicts with thier political agenda.This Post will be deleted by the ACLU as it conflicts with thier misconstrued enumeration