www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Dec 15th, 2009
Posted by Suzanne Ito, ACLU at 5:55pm

Gitmo, Illinois

Today, President Obama ordered the federal government to purchase the Thomson Correctional Center, a maximum security prison in northwestern Illinois, and the new home for a "limited number" of detainees currently held at Guantánamo Bay.

This sounds like a good thing—we've been advocating for the closure of Guantánamo for years.

Unfortunately, the order comes with really bad news.

Reports indicate that Thomson will be the new home for detainees the government has no intention of releasing or bringing to trial. It's the return of that "fifth category" of detainees President Obama described in his national security speech last May, those "who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases because evidence may be tainted, but who nonetheless pose a threat to the security of the United States." The Obama administration—like the Bush administration—has maintained that it has the right to hold detainees without charge or trial under the Authorization for Use of Military Force.

It is estimated that as many as 75 detainees could potentially be part of this fifth category.

But as we pointed out last year, a policy of indefinite detention is unnecessary and unwise, and would give the president carte blanche to break the law—something we've all seen enough of from the past administration.

The process will likely next head to Capitol Hill as administration officials have said the president will need "some change in law, and some funding, obviously, from Congress." What Congress and the President need to hear loud and clear—is that simply moving Guantanamo's policies from Cuba to Illinois won't solve the problem. Instead, it just puts indefinite detention without charge or trial onto American soil. The answer is to charge and try anyone against whom we have evidence of committing a crime, and resettle or repatriate everyone else.

Tags: Close Gitmo

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

4 Responses to "Gitmo, Illinois"

  1. Blah Says:

    I can't Gitmo satifaction! Hey he looks jewish and that guy he looks gay and don't foret the mongoliods. See you in camps, That is, Gitmo North Amerika!

  2. Anonymous Says:

    How about we free all of the detainees and move them to your neighborhood?

  3. Anonymous Says:

    How about we re read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and stop the policy by irrational fear.

  4. roald Says:

    anon #2, why all the hostility? People who know better than us say if we did, the neighborhood would be safer than if we free all the gang members and move them to our neighborhood.

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image