Categories
Join Us At:
|
News Outlets Object to Gitmo Reporter BanEarly this morning, a plane carrying journalists departed from Andrews Air Force Base for Guantánamo. Tomorrow, the pretrial hearings of 50-year-old Sudanese national Ibrahim al-Qosi will restart. Muna Shikaki of al-Arabiya tweeted from Andrews that only four American news outlets were on the plane to cover al-Qosi's proceedings. Perhaps most notable is who was not among the journalists: Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald, who's covered the military commissions since its inception and has served as the unofficial den mother to all Gitmo journalists. Rosenberg, along with three other reporters, remains banned by the Department of Defense (DOD) after reporting the name of one of the interrogators who testified at Omar Khadr's pretrial hearing in May. The military commissions judge had ordered the identity of the interrogator withheld, even though it had already been disclosed in previous news reports and an on-the-record interview he gave to one of the other banned reporters, Michelle Shephard of the Toronto Star, in 2008. Last Thursday, David Schulz, an attorney whose firm is representing the Miami Herald, the Associated Press, Wall Street Journal publisher Dow Jones & Company, The New York Times, Reuters and the Washington Post, sent a letter to DOD general counsel Jeh Johnson raising legal objections to the ban, and specifically requesting that the ban on Rosenberg be lifted. McClatchy reports: the organizations argue that the Pentagon's interpretation of the rules is "plainly illegal'' because it bars publication of information considered "protected'' even if the information is already widely known and publicly available. Soon after the reporters were banned, the ACLU, Human Rights First, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the National Institute for Military Justice — all organizations that monitor the military commissions on a regular basis — sent a group letter calling on the DOD to reverse its decision. The DoD has agreed to lift the ban on August 5. With hearings resuming now, that’s not soon enough. The ACLU's Jamil Dakwar is in Guantánamo now and will be blogging about the hearings this week.
|
|
Early this morning, a plane carrying journalists departed from Andrews Air Force Base for Guantánamo. Tomorrow, the pretrial hearings of 50-year-old Sudanese national 
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.
We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.
Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.