Hudson v. Michigan 
Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED
January 9, 2006
The Fourth Amendment requires the police to knock and announce their presence before executing a search warrant, except in exigent circumstances. The police in this case violated that rule. The issue is whether evidence seized during the search should be suppressed under the exclusionary rule. Related Multimedia
Savana Redding on her Supreme Court Case
This video tells the story of the Savana Redding case before her case was heard at the Supreme Court. When Savana was 13 years old, she was strip-searched for allegedly ...
