Halbert v. Michigan
Location:
Michigan
Court Type:
U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed (Judgment)
Last Update: January 11, 2006
What's at Stake
Raising the same issue as Kowalski, which was dismissed on standing grounds. DECIDED
Summary
In Michigan, an indigent criminal defendant who wishes to challenge his sentence after pleading guilty (or pursue other possible legal claims) is generally not entitled to appointed counsel, even for a first appeal. Michigan is the only state in the country that denies appointed counsel under these circumstances. The question in this case is whether the Michigan rule violates the Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protecting under the law.
Legal Documents
Press Releases
Jan 11, 2006
Michigan Judge Thumbs His Nose at U.S. Supreme Court Ruling on Poor People's Right to an Attorney
Oct 04, 2004
ACLU Argues in Supreme Court that the Poor Have a Right to Counsel
Jun 23, 2005
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Michigan Law
Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts
Donate now