When I wrote about Justin Bieber's trouble with the law last week, we didn't know how far he'd fall in just a few days. Now Bieber has been arrested for late-night drag racing in Miami Beach. If convicted, another immigrant in his situation would very likely languish in immigration detention before being deported. That person—like 84 percent of people in immigration detention-- would also likely not have an immigration attorney, let alone a high-priced one.
While the media is focused on what will happen to Bieber, let's instead focus on what will happen to all of the other immigrants who are detained and deported for lesser offenses than his. Learn more about them.
Learn more about immigrant deportation and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
Related Issues
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseAug 2026
Immigrants' Rights
Aclu Comment On Federal Appeals Court Ruling In Alien Enemies Act Challenge . Explore Press Release.ACLU Comment on Federal Appeals Court Ruling in Alien Enemies Act Challenge
NEW ORLEANS — The full Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans today dismissed W.M.M. v. Trump, a case challenging President Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. The court ruled the case was moot because plaintiffs have since been removed under immigration laws, not the Alien Enemies Act. The court did not rule on the merits of the lawsuit. The ruling stems from a case filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Texas challenging the president’s use of this centuries-old wartime act in peacetime. The Supreme Court previously blocked the Trump administration from using the Alien Enemies Act to remove Venezuelans who were being detained in northern Texas and told the Fifth Circuit to expedite the appeal, while keeping a stay in place. In September 2025, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit rejected the administration’s assertion that the wartime authority’s invocation was lawful because an “invasion or a predatory incursion has occurred.” The Trump administration then sought a hearing before the full appeals court, which heard the case in January 2026. The ACLU has other legal challenges to the Alien Enemies Act ongoing throughout the country. The following is reaction to today’s Fifth Circuit ruling: “The Supreme Court's injunction barring use of the Alien Enemies Act remains in place, which is essential because there are still people at risk of being wrongly removed under the act without due process. The Fifth Circuit decision also doesn’t change the fact that courts have overwhelmingly held that the use of this wartime authority during peacetime is unlawful,” said ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, who argued the case. The ruling is here.Court Case: WMM v. TrumpAffiliate: Texas -
News & CommentaryAug 2026
Privacy & Technology
Immigrants' Rights
Ice Agents To Wear Body Cameras But The Fix Is In. Explore News & Commentary.ICE Agents to Wear Body Cameras But the Fix is In
The technology appears unlikely to constrain the immigration agencies; much more sweeping reforms are neededBy: Jay Stanley -
Press ReleaseAug 2026
Immigrants' Rights
Legal Groups That Secured Supreme Court Birthright Victory Move To Protect Babies From Trump's Latest Attacks On Citizenship . Explore Press Release.Legal Groups That Secured Supreme Court Birthright Victory Move to Protect Babies From Trump's Latest Attacks on Citizenship
CONCORD, N.H. — Legal groups that recently won a major Supreme Court victory on behalf of babies who would have been denied citizenship under a failed Trump executive order are asking a court to ensure those children remain protected from the president’s latest attacks. The Supreme Court handed the civil rights organizations a resounding win on June 30 in Trump v. Barbara, when it struck down the president’s order that sought to undo this fundamental constitutional protection. Last week, the president signed a new executive order again targeting birthright citizenship. The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Legal Defense Fund, Asian Law Caucus, and Democracy Defenders Fund successfully argued the Barbara case. Today, they asked a federal court to make it unquestionably clear that the citizenship of babies covered by that class-action lawsuit is protected despite this new executive order. In its June ruling, the Supreme Court confirmed that the Constitution’s Citizenship Clause puts “the question of citizenship ‘once and forever [to] rest.’” In their motion filed today in New Hampshire federal court, where the lawsuit was first filed, the legal groups wrote: “The Supreme Court confirmed that there are no additional exceptions beyond those recognized in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and the Fourteenth Amendment is not subject to executive (or legislative) revision. President Trump’s continued resistance to that principle calls for this Court’s renewed intervention.” The following is comment on today’s filing: “President Trump may not like the fact that birthright citizenship is a constitutional right, and he may not like that he lost in the Supreme Court, but that is really beside the point,” said Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and lead counsel. “It’s well past time for these illegal and cruel attacks on children’s citizenship to end.” “The Supreme Court could not have been more clear: President Trump’s attempt to redefine who is an American citizen through executive action was unconstitutional,” said Amia Trigg, deputy director of litigation at the Legal Defense Fund. “Now, the president is trying to double down on his illegal attack on this constitutional protection. We will not stand idly by as the executive branch blatantly ignores the court's authority in its crusade against American children.” “This order is a desperate and brazen attempt to bypass the Supreme Court’s decision and expand a very narrow set of exceptions to the 14th Amendment. As the court has already affirmed, it’s the Constitution, not the president, who determines who is American and who gets a say in our democracy. Americans are struggling to put food on the table and pay their bills, and this administration is just throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks,” said Aarti Kohli, executive director of the Asian Law Caucus. “Immigrant communities know that our rights are on the line, especially when the government uses us as scapegoats. The Trump administration already lost once and it will lose again.” “President Trump’s latest attempt to chip away at birthright citizenship is as constitutionally futile as it is cruel,” said Norm Eisen, co-founder and executive chair of Democracy Defenders Fund. “We’ve seen this strategy from this administration before, and the courts have repeatedly made it clear that the 14th Amendment cannot be rewritten by executive fiat. We are filing this motion to ensure that the protections currently shielding our clients remain intact — we will not let the administration use babies as pawns in a political stunt like this.” SangYeob Kim, director of the ACLU-NH Immigrants’ Rights Project, said, “Birthright citizenship is the law of the land — period. Cruel attacks on this core constitutional right must not be allowed to stand.” “The Supreme Court reaffirmed the plain language of the Constitution in June, making it clear that neither the president nor Congress can end birthright citizenship,” said ACLU of Maine Executive Director Molly Curren Rowles. “We’ll continue defending the Constitution and the core principles reflected in the 14th Amendment: that with few exceptions, every baby born on U.S. soil is a U.S. citizen.” “Trump's executive orders are a ham-handed attempt to distract the American people from the Supreme Court’s clear holding: that birthright citizenship is protected by our Constitution,” said Carol Rose, executive director at the ACLU of Massachusetts. “We'll stay in court for as long as it takes to secure peace of mind for our clients and ensure that babies born on U.S. soil have their rights as guaranteed under U.S. law.” Read the motion here: https://www.aclu.org/cases/barbara-v-donald-j-trump?document=Motion-to-Clarify-PI#legal-documentsCourt Case: Barbara v. Donald J. TrumpAffiliates: New Hampshire, Maine, Massachusetts -
Press ReleaseAug 2026
Immigrants' Rights
Aclu Slams New Trump Attack On Birthright Citizenship . Explore Press Release.ACLU Slams New Trump Attack on Birthright Citizenship
NEW YORK — The American Civil Liberties Union today condemned President Trump’s latest attacks on birthright citizenship with his new executive orders. The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a stinging loss just a few weeks ago when it struck down the president’s previous order that sought to undo this fundamental constitutional protection. The ACLU successfully argued that case, Trump v. Barbara. “The Supreme Court already decided this issue: Birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Constitution. No additional executive order can change the meaning of the Constitution. Any executive order that tries to rewrite birthright citizenship will meet the same fate as the last one,” said Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project.