Banning Trans Girls From School Sports Is Neither Feminist Nor Legal

Andraya Yearwood, a junior at Cromwell High School in Connecticut, recently finished second in the 55-meter dash at the state open indoor track championships. But instead of well-deserved accolades from her community, she now finds her achievements being publicly challenged — simply because she is transgender.

There is a long legacy of sex discrimination in athletics. Myths, such as the idea that physical exertion would harm women’s reproductive systems or that women were inherently inferior athletes, were historically used to “protect” women out of participation in entire fields, including marathon racing and contact sports, despite ample evidence that girls can compete and win against boys. The enactment of Title IX, the federal statute banning sex discrimination in school programs and activities receiving federal funds, was intended to end such discrimination, and it has indeed resulted in a dramatic increase in girls’ participation in sports. But girls — and particularly girls of color — still face stark inequalities in opportunities, funding, and resources.

The marginalization of trans student athletes is rooted in the same harmful history of gender discrimination and stereotyping that has impeded the achievement of gender equality in sports as a whole. Old stereotypes regarding athleticism, biology, and gender are being directed at transgender girls, who are frequently told outright that they are not girls (and conversely transgender boys are told they are not really boys). This policing of gender has been used to justify subjecting transgender student athletes to numerous additional barriers to participating in sports, from onerous medical requirements to segregation in locker rooms to outright bans on their participation.

The truth is, transgender women and girls have been competing in sports at all levels for years, and there is no research supporting the claim that they maintain a competitive advantage. As Yearwood rightfully pointed out, all athletes, cis and trans, compete with different advantages, but only some are questioned:

“One high jumper could be taller and have longer legs than another, but the other could have perfect form, and then do better. One sprinter could have parents who spend so much money on personal training for their child, which in turn, would cause that child to run faster.”

When girls are pushed out of sports, they miss out on the community building, leadership skills, and all of the other benefits that being part of a team can offer. This is particularly harmful for transgender students, who face detrimental effects on their physical and emotional wellbeing when they are pushed out of affirming spaces and communities.

These stereotypes are also being invoked in the arena of professional sports, where so-called “gender testing” has been used to police the bodies of women of color and intersex women. The International Association of Athletic Federations has targeted athletes like Dutee Chand and Caster Semenya for testosterone testing based on arbitrary limits. IAAF’s new set of proposed regulations, which Semenya is challenging, would require female athletes with hyperandrogenism to undergo unnecessary medical treatment to suppress their hormones in order to compete.

Cisgender women should be concerned whenever an alleged concern for “protecting” our wellbeing is invoked to justify exclusion. We’ve seen these arguments play out with the harmful and debunked “bathroom predator” myth, where false concerns for cis girls and sexual harassment have been used to promote legislation banning transgender people from public restrooms. Most recently, we’ve seen it harnessed by legislators like those in South Dakota who have capitalized on recent transphobic comments to push for bills like SB 1225, which would have banned all trans youth from playing sports in school consistent with their gender identity.

One thing is clear: The politicians who introduce these anti-trans bills are not concerned with the integrity of girls’ athletics, any more than proponents of bathroom bans are concerned about preventing gender-based violence. We must see these efforts for what they are: fear mongering intended to push transgender and nonbinary people out of public spaces.

When misinformation about biology and gender is used to bar transgender girls from sports in schools receiving federal funds, it amounts to the same form of sex discrimination that has long been prohibited under Title IX. Schools should look for ways to support all girls who want to participate in athletics, rather than attempt to police gender on the basis of impermissible sex stereotypes.

View comments (208)
Read the Terms of Use

Ms. Gloria Anasyrma

To be fair they need to start including transgenders in the special oylmpics.




60 minutes was right about the ACLU. You’re no longer defenders of The Bill of Rights, but you’re now a political advocacy group. Males outperform females athletically for a multitude of reasons, and a little reduction in testosterone doesn’t eliminate that. Clearly, women’s rights are on the back, back, back burner in the ACLU today.


Please stop perpetuating that lie. It isn't a little reduction in testosterone. HRT brings the androgens in proportion to cisgender markers. The reduction of testosterone is drastic, and causes physiological changes to match cisgender females in the transwoman's family.

Helen Barton

That's why, since 2003 when trans women were first allowed to compete in the Olympics, not 1 [ONE] transgender athlete has even qualified to compete, nevermind medalled in any sport. This after over 50,000 athletes have competed over 15 years. Your perceived "unfair advantage" doesn't exist except in your bigotted imagination.

Tom In Kansas

How, then, would you characterize Rachel McKinnon's overwhelming defeat of all professional female cyclists from her earliest appearances, or the many other trans-athletes who are doing the same at non-Olympic levels of competition. I think we are looking for a solution that is equitable to everyone. No?


This is just...wrong. Male bodied people, no matter how they "identify" should NEVER be competing against women. it's completely regressive and unfair to all women in sport.


With that argument, do you argue that trans men should compete against cisgender women? How should we also then deal with normal human variation in hormone levels? Should women with naturally high testosterone levels be banned in your view?


there is little research that actually considers the impact of transition on performance vs. female performance; there is ample research that demonstrates a difference in body systems and strength differences in males vs females (lung capacity, heart size, grip strength, valgus angle ratio, muscle memory and the effect of testosterone, bone density and the effect of estrogen on bone density). There is also the record of performance differences in males vs. females both in hs/college and at the Olympic level. Conducting more pointed research on this particular issue is the only fair - and feminist - way to evaluate how to proceed.


No one's trying to ban trans girls from school sports. We want to keep female sports leagues and events for females.


Stay Informed