Is the FBI Setting the Stage for Increased Surveillance of Black Activists?

A recently leaked FBI “Intelligence Assessment” contains troubling signs that the FBI is scrutinizing and possibly surveilling Black activists in its search for potential “extremists.”

The report, which the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division prepared, identifies what it calls “Black Identity Extremists” as security threats. Their “perceptions of police brutality against African Americans … will very likely serve as justification” for violence against law enforcement officers, the report claims. Today, the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Center for Media Justice seeking other records regarding the FBI’s surveillance of Black people on the basis of a supposed shared ideology, including records using the term “Black Identity Extremists.”

The report is disturbing on several levels, starting with the label “Black Identity Extremist.” Its definition of the term is so confusing as to be unintelligible:

“The FBI defines black identity extremists as individuals who seek, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence, in response to perceived racism and injustice in American society and some do so in furtherance of establishing a separate black homeland or autonomous black social institutions, communities, or governing organizations within the United States.”

What seems to be a made-up term raises concerns that the FBI created the designation to enhance government scrutiny of Black activists, including people involved in Black Lives Matter, which some wrongly blame for incidents of violence and label a hate group. By focusing on ideology and viewpoint in defining what constitutes a so-called “Black Identity Extremist,” the FBI is spending valuable resources to target those who object to racism and injustice in America.

The report is also flawed in its conclusions and methodology. Any violence against law enforcement officers is unacceptable, but the FBI’s focus on supposed “Black Identity Extremists” appears misplaced. Studies show that attacks against police officers are extremely rare and that white men carry out the overwhelming majority of those attacks.

In addition to missing that context, the report offers no evidence to support its assessment that “Black Identity Extremists” are a threat because they supposedly share a violent ideology. Instead, the FBI’s conclusion is premised on a description of six separate violent incidents and the “key assumption” that those incidents were ideologically motivated. In other words, the report appears to assume its own core conclusion. The report even contradicts itself by acknowledging that the six incidents appear to have been “influenced by more than one ideological perspective.”

The report is yet another indication that the FBI thinks it can identify security threats by scrutinizing people’s beliefs and speech. In making its assessment, the FBI relied on individuals’ use of social media, including who they associated with, what search terms they used, and what content they liked. But there’s nothing wrong with having radical or “extreme” ideas, and evidence shows that the overwhelming majority of people who hold radical beliefs do not engage in or support violence.

The danger, of course, is that Black activists now have even more reason to be concerned that the law enforcement will surveil and take action against them for engaging in constitutionally protected speech. In an interview with the Guardian, one BLM activist said the “Black Identity Extremist” classification would “criminalize anyone who is already in the movement.” This is a concern that even an international human rights expert from the U.N. expressed when reporting on the chilling effects of police practices against protesters. Such targeting of Black activists also throws open the door to racial profiling.

The FBI’s history gives Black activists plenty of cause for concern. In the 1960s, the FBI conducted extensive surveillance of those it deemed “Black Extremists” and “Black Nationalists” under the covert COINTELPRO program. The FBI has been “mapping” racial and ethnic communities in the United States, including the Black population in Georgia, based on crude and false stereotypes about particular communities' propensity to commit certain crimes. That mapping included scrutiny of protests against police killings.

And FBI domestic terrorism training presentations conflate examples of armed resistance, or armed self-defense, by older organizations like the Black Panthers and the Black Liberation Army with beliefs expressed by various modern groups to suggest, without evidence, that these latter-day groups pose a similar threat. More recently, Department of Homeland Security records from 2014 and 2015 show that government officials trolled social media accounts to map and collect information on Black Lives Matter protests and supposedly related events.

The FBI’s recent “Intelligence Assessment” is yet another example of using “domestic terror” and “extremism” as a smokescreen for silencing constitutionally protected speech and unfairly targeting civil rights activists through surveillance. By conjuring this category of “Black Identity Extremists,” the FBI dangerously equates domestic extremist movements that are actually on the rise, like white supremacists, with one that looks near nonexistent.

The public needs to know more about the FBI’s activities related to what it calls “Black Identity Extremism.” Obtaining the agency’s records on these activities is one step toward protecting the free speech and privacy rights of Black activists.

Add a comment (6)
Read the Terms of Use

Dr. Joseph Goebbels

"... a separate black homeland or autonomous black social institutions, communities, or governing organizations within the United States...”: segregationist George Wallace circa 1960.

WhiteyFear

It’s because the white justice department and FBI fear minorities becoming the majority in the department. Then they will investigate the Nazi groups, the klan groups, and other white hate groups finally.

Jeffery Sessions and his nigger killin grandpappy are so afraid of blacks and Mexicans they would rather kill them then listen to rap music while on hold.

gejala darah tinggi

4 Macam Gejala Darah Tinggi Yang Biasa Muncul http://gejaladarahtinggi.best-agaric.net
5 Gejala Darah Tinggi Dan Cara Mengatasinya http://gejaladarahtinggi.agaricpro.net
5 Gejala Darah Tinggi Dan 6 Penyebab http://gejaladarahtinggi.best-agaric.com
6 Gejala Darah Tinggi Yang Paling Berbahaya http://gejaladarahtinggi.agaricpro.com
Apa Gejala Darah Tinggi Di Usia Muda? http://gejaladarahtinggi.agaricpro.info
Bagaiman Cara Mengenali Gejala Darah Tinggi Sejak Dini http://gejaladarahtinggi.bestagaric.net
Ciri-Ciri Orang Gejala Tekanan Darah Tinggi Hipertensi http://gejaladarahtinggi.bestagaric.web.id
4 Gejala Darah Tinggi Dan Pencegahannya http://gejaladarahtinggi.healthylifeindonesia.com
5 Gejala Darah Tinggi Yang Harus Diwaspadai http://gejaladarahtinggi.bestagaric.com
5 Gejala Tekanan Darah Tinggi Hipertensi Dan Solusinya http://gejaladarahtinggi.bestagaric.org
Tanda Dan Gejala Ketika Darah Tinggi Naik http://gejaladarahtinggi.agaricpro.web.id
5 Gejala Tekanan Darah Tinggi Dan Kolesterol http://gejaladarahtinggi.agaricpro.biz
4 Ciri-Ciri Umum Gejala Darah Tinggi Dan Solusinya http://gejaladarahtinggi.agaricpro.org
5 Gejala Darah Tinggi Hipertensi Secara Umum http://gejaladarahtinggi.tasikstore.com

Mike M

SO one-sided. Has anybody thought to pull the GO IS on the White Supremacist groups? I'd be willing to bet that there's terminology in there that doesn't "mesh" with society. But, we'll never know because those that can do this have an agenda and will only delve into that which proves their agenda: a self-fulfilling prophesy.

James Frederick

"The FBI defines black identity extremists as individuals who seek, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence, in response to perceived racism and injustice in American society and some do so in furtherance of establishing a separate black homeland or autonomous black social institutions, communities, or governing organizations within the United States." - It definitely seems like Black identity extremists as people who wish to take Black identity to the point where they wish to make their own country within the boundaries of the United States.

Tree Removal Alpharetta

Mike M

However, I do agree with Mike M previously, in that there are also white identity groups as well, so it is not only a black identity issue.

http://www.treeservicesalpharettaga.com

Stay Informed