Kalief Browder’s Tragic Death and the Criminal Injustice of Our Bail System

Over the last two weeks, Americans have revisited the tragic details of the death of 22-year-old Kalief Browder. The documentary series “Time: The Kalief Browder Story,” airs its third of six episodes tonight about Kalief, who spent three years in jail without ever being convicted of the crime with which he was charged.

Kalief’s story matters. It matters for his family. It matters for his community. It matters for New York. It matters for our entire nation.

In Kalief’s story we can clearly see a culpable and fundamentally broken criminal justice system that punishes people for being poor, and subjects individuals to inhumane treatment. Kalief was 16 years old when he arrested in 2010 for allegedly stealing a backpack. He was charged with robbery, grand larceny, and assault. Bail was set at $3,000. The family could not afford that amount, so Kalief didn’t get to go home after he was charged. Instead, he was sent to the infamous Rikers Island jail in New York City.

Let’s just pause on that fact: He had to go to Rikers because he couldn’t pay $3,000 in bail.

Kalief spent more than 1,100 days incarcerated, maintaining his innocence throughout. Prosecutors repeatedly offered plea deals, which Kalief rejected. After 74 days of incarceration, bail was revoked altogether. By the time he left Rikers, this boy, who had been accused of stealing a backpack, had spent almost 800 days of solitary confinement.

Eventually prosecutors realized they had no case and dismissed all charges. He was released on June 5, 2013. Yet the damage done to him was a new kind of prison that stayed with him. After his release, he told The New Yorker, “I’m not all right. I’m messed up.” On June 6, 2015, he hung himself with an air conditioner cord. He was 22 years old.

Kalief’s abuse at the hands of the criminal justice system is a clarion to overhaul our nation’s jail system.

On any given day, hundreds of thousands of Americans who haven’t been convicted of a crime rot in jail simply because they are too poor to afford bail amounts that would secure their freedom.

More than 3,000 jails in the United States hold more than 650,000 people on any given day. About two-thirds, 450,000 people, are held awaiting trial. Most are in jail because they could not afford bail or a bail agent refused to post a bond. Their wealth determines whether they are incarcerated.

This pretrial detention jails nearly half a million people at any given time and fuels over-incarceration by inducing guilty pleas, forcing people to lose jobs and housing, subjecting them to longer sentences, and exacting physical and financial damage. The inability to afford bail ruins lives, harms whole families, and has a negative impact on entire communities.

The growth of jails in the U.S. is a major contributor to the national disease of mass incarceration. According to a report by the Vera Institute for Justice, the number of annual jail admissions doubled in the past three decades to 12 million, and the average length of stay increased from 14 to 23 days. According to the report, half of the people in New York City’s jails in 2013 were held on bail of $2,500 or less. And the system reproduces the structural racism already embedded in the criminal justice system. Black Americans, who make up 13 percent of the U.S. population, account for 36 percent of the jail population. They are jailed at almost four times the rate of white Americans.

Yet there is hope. The ACLU and communities across the nation are fighting back, rejecting systems that require money in exchange for freedom. The state of New Jersey recently overhauled its bail system and nearly eliminated cash bail while also establishing a pretrial services agency. The reforms, which took effect in January of this year, are encouraging: In 3,382 cases processed in the first four weeks of January, judges set bail only three times.

The bail reform movement is gaining steam across America. While New Jersey’s overhaul may be the most far-reaching, Alaska, Maine, and New Mexico also made progress on bail reform last year. And throughout 2017, the ACLU will be working in Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Ohio, Nebraska, Texas, Vermont, and Washington to advance reforms that would allow people to go home without bail.

Nothing will bring Kalief Browder back. But his tragic end is not the end of his story. We need to reform our nation’s broken criminal justice system and ensure that no one else faces the horrible tragedy Kalief did. This is how we honor him.

Add a comment (67)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

Spot on!

Anonymous

Spot on!

John

While this is a tragic story. There are laws governing the right to a speedy trial. Also he was not in jail because he couldn't afford bail he was in jail because he was accused of a crime. And previously convicted of a felony. I have to say I'm very confused at why he was denied the right to a speedy trial. But I think this article is skewed by saying that he was in jail because he couldn't afford the bail of $3,000. He was in jail because he was accused of a crime. And a previously convicted felon.

SLC

Person A was a previously convicted felon who was accused of a crime and taken to jail. Person A was able to make bail and was released on bail.
Person B, same story, except for bail.
If he had been able to make bail, he would not have been in jail.

Anonymous

If that was your son and he was in jail for a crime he did not commit and you couldn't afford the 3,000$ to bail him out, so he was sent to prison with no trial and no proof he committed any crime, would you feel the same as you just commented?

Anonymous

New York has different laws about speedy trails that the DA exploited in order to continually postpone the trail.
There is no way anyone can hear this story and think that our system isn't broken. 14 months in solitary is certainly cruel and unusual. The world lost this young man and his potential was limitless. We don't know what he would have done with his life. The whole world was robbed of that and we should be OUTRAGED.
I am.

Anonymous

One crime does not constitute guilt for another. In order to see things fairly you have to free your mindset. In America are so called "free world" is not so free. They say you are innocent until proven guilty, that's bull! Its guilty prove your innocents. Jails are a profitable business and is run as such in every sense. Not only do they punish they punish the so called accused (depending on what mood that cops are in that day), they punish the families because they are the ones who have to come up with the money.

Let us all be honest, conviction with a person who cannot afford bail is not necessarily guilty. Pleading guilty is a way to get out of jail.

Bridget

He was 16 accused o stealing a backbck, I don't care if he had a prior non violent felony conviction and his felony charge was non violent. He should not be in jail for almost 3 years without a hesring. Now the family gets to sue for good reason and a young man is dead. But, all you seem concerned about is continuing to pointment out he committed a crime.

Bridget

He was 16 accused o stealing a backbck, I don't care if he had a prior non violent felony conviction and his felony charge was non violent. He should not be in jail for almost 3 years without a hesring. Now the family gets to sue for good reason and a young man is dead. But, all you seem concerned about is continuing to pointment out he committed a crime.

Bridget

He was 16 accused o stealing a backbck, I don't care if he had a prior non violent felony conviction and his felony charge was non violent. He should not be in jail for almost 3 years without a hesring. Now the family gets to sue for good reason and a young man is dead. But, all you seem concerned about is continuing to pointment out he committed a crime.

Pages

Sign Up for Breaking News