Revised Settlement Means Even Stronger Protection From NYPD Surveillance for New York’s Muslims

Imam Hamid Hassan Raza, the lead plaintiff in Raza v. City of New York.

Update (3/21/2017): The federal judge in our lawsuit has approved the proposed settlement with the NYPD, as has the judge in the Handschu case. It's official: New York Muslims and all New Yorkers will now have strong protections from discriminatory and unjustified surveillance. The federal government and police forces around the country should take note that law enforcement can and must do its job without resorting to discrimination.

As religious bigotry rises to a fever pitch nationwide, New York City is leading by example against it.

Today, a revised settlement announced in a pair of challenges to the NYPD’s surveillance of New York’s Muslims would, if approved, enhance protections against discriminatory and unconstitutional policing. This settlement sends a message that the nation needs to hear.

Our clients’ experience is a cautionary example of what can happen when law enforcement goes awry. They are three individuals — Imam Hassan Raza, Asad Dandia, and Mohammad Elshinawy; two mosques, Masjid At-Taqwa and Masjid Al-Ansar; and a non-profit organization, Muslims Giving Back — who alleged that they were swept up in the NYPD’s years-long dragnet surveillance of the city’s Muslim residents. The lawsuit, Raza v. City of New York, asserted that starting in 2002, the police department had mapped Muslim communities and their institutions, sent officers and informants into mosques to monitor innocent religious leaders and congregants, and used other invasive means to spy on Muslims.   

New York’s Muslim communities had long known that they were subject to invasive NYPD surveillance and investigation because of their religion. The devastating effects were predictable: Muslims suffered stigma and chilled their speech and religious practice because of fear of attracting unwarranted police scrutiny. Religious leaders like our clients censored themselves in public and recorded sermons and conversations out of fear they could be misrepresented. Organizations and social networks like Muslims Giving Back were ripped apart because of actual or suspected informants in their midst. Congregants at mosques like our client mosques were suspicious of newcomers, despite their religious desire to welcome all, and attendance at places of worship and charitable donations declined. 

The full extent of NYPD practices came to light thanks to reporting by the Associated Press, which confirmed that the department sent paid infiltrators into mosques, student associations, and community events — including a wedding — to take photos and keep tabs on religious leaders, congregants, and community members. Those practices did not make people safer; they did, however, seriously damage police-community relationships.

Together with the New York Civil Liberties Union and the CLEAR project at CUNY School of Law, the ACLU filed suit on behalf of our clients in 2013. The law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP joined soon after. Our clients sought to enforce two of the Constitution’s most fundamental guarantees: freedom of religion and equal treatment for all.

Fast forward through intense litigation to settlement discussions. In February 2014, after a new mayoral administration came into office, the NYPD, our legal team, and lawyers in what’s called the Handschu case began settlement discussions. Handschu v. Special Services Division is a decades-old class-action suit challenging the NYPD’s unconstitutional surveillance of political groups and activists. It resulted in the Handschu Guidelines, spelled out in a 1986 consent decree, which regulate NYPD surveillance of political activity. Those guidelines were weakened in 2003 upon the insistence of the NYPD, enabling many of the abuses that our clients challenged, and attorneys in the Handschu case brought a separate claim asserting that the NYPD’s surveillance of Muslim New Yorkers had violated the guidelines.

New reforms establish critical protections for New York Muslims and all New Yorkers

In January 2016, the NYPD agreed to settlement terms that imposed a number of important safeguards. For the first time, the NYPD agreed to a robust equal protection policy, prohibiting investigations in which race, religion, ethnicity, or national origin is a substantial or motivating factor. The NYPD also agreed to prohibit overly broad, open-ended investigations; require that investigations account for their potential impact on religious activity; and limit their use of undercovers and informants. Critically, the settlement also installs a civilian representative to serve as a check on the police department. (More details on the terms of the 2016 settlement agreement are here.)

After a public hearing, during which community members weighed in on the proposed settlement, the judge in the Handschu case, Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a ruling recommending three additional enhancements to the Handschu Guidelines. The resulting settlement negotiations led to an agreement that is now even stronger. It was today submitted to the courts overseeing both cases for their approval. 

Under the new enhancements, the civilian representative has even greater authority, independence, and responsibility. She is empowered to report to the court at any time if there are violations of the Handschu Guidelines, is required to report systematic violations, and must report to the court on an annual basis. The mayor is prohibited from abolishing the civilian representative position without judicial approval, and abolition by order of the court is only permitted if there have not been systemic violations of the Handschu Guidelines for the preceding three years. The civilian representative is specifically authorized to review not just the opening or extension of investigations, but also how they are conducted. In addition, the civilian representative will review the propriety of the use of undercover officers or confidential informants — a source of great concern to communities. 

These changes would not have come without our clients’ courageous stand for equality and rights, and the support of many community activists seeking NYPD reform who have forcefully advocated against discriminatory surveillance. Of course, even the enhanced settlement is not, and could not be, a panacea. As my co-counsel Ramzi Kassem and I have emphasized:

“It is a platform upon which to build further reform and advance shared goals of a more just society and policing. The settlement will help ensure policing in New York City does not have a misplaced focus on religion, ideology, and race and directs attention and resources towards actual criminal conduct. A similar path nationally may be a long one, but we hope the rest of the country follows.”

The enhanced settlement comes at a time when anti-Muslim rhetoric and hysteria are rampant and  increasingly stoked by officials at the highest level of government who resort to fear-mongering and a disregard for facts. Today’s settlement is an important antidote and a major advance for everyone: for our clients and all New Yorkers who have a right to be free from discrimination and to practice their religion without fear, and for the NYPD, which will become more effective by focusing on proven policing strategies rather than ineffective, bias-based policing. 

Federal officials and local police elsewhere should take heed. When our police departments go too far, we’ll be ready to fight back.

Add a comment (10)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

Need to update petition menu in above article.

Anonymous

Under the 1st and 14th Amendments, if we blacklist and profile American citizens of an unpopular religion - we must subject the religions of the Oklahoma City terrorists (Baptists and Pentacostals) and every church member to the exact same profiling. Unlike Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan - America has religious freedom, not a theocratic government.

Anonymous

you people are f in stupid. get a job and let Trump serve. you are going to create a riot and beleive me you do not want to fight Trump supporters. Bikers, construction workers,etc wil destroy you candy asses.

Kyle

Hey Anonymous believe me you would not want this country to be left with just bikers, and blue collar workers... I hope Trump does a good job.... I am not a fan of Hillary either but I believe the democratic administration under Clinton would have been more civilized then the republic administration under Trump. With that said he worries alot of people, just listen to him on Twitter for past year he has no filter, he is the elected president of the free world and that is disturbing, like I said I hope he comes thru for the country but you my friend have got to take that hate you talking out of your heart that attitude does not help anyone in dealing with this, we all need to believe in each other and the strong will of the people that make up the beauty and values of this country.

#2 Anonymous

For 1 it was people like the bikers and the blue collar workers back in the day the farmers, the small working people who made this country.Trump is not a politician, He does not talk like a politician.That's why he was elected.Actions speak louder than words or with Hillary who provided nothing but lies.Trump is for the American worker FIRST.The hate and attitude are only in the hearts of Hillary supporters who will not except that that lying, treasonous, self-centered democrat lost to Trump. Get on the waggon or get out of the way. This is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for AMERICANS (Legal) Americans.

Kyle

Get your facts in order. By no means is Trump a saint or any of these politicians lets be real come on we can agree on that. Also immigrants(Legal ones,yes!) have advanced this country in unspeakable ways and in so many sectors. Bikers and farmers can take a hike if you compare what immigrants have contributed to this nation. Lastly you are wrong I accept Trump won but he cant expect to do crazy things and not have people speak out against it, that is our protected constitutional right maybe you do not know this, please listen to him on twitter do me that favor see what he says and come back to me and then tell me that it makes sense why people are outraged, at no time ever has an elected president been rallied on the way he is being on rallied, might be something to that so that things dont go out of hand and drive this nation into anarchy. Oh and by the way you dont need to use a biker or construction worker to intimidate anyone , noone is scared and your talking like a person who has no idea what he is saying

Anonymous

farmers can take a hike? do you prefer your fruits and veggies from china?

Kyle

No, and not what I meant, farmers are doing agricultural work as is done by any country, it is standard work even for the poorest countries to farm, and should not be compared to what immigrants have done for this country. Bikers destroy the country they are the last patriotic and are ignorant and poorly educated at best, I am not speaking for them as a whole but in general I am sure there are plenty decent bikers but please don't bring them into this mix, not a strong point on your end.

Anonymous islam...

Islam is a political movement as much as a religion. Yes we have religious freedom, but Islam takes advantage of this and as it grows, squeezes out other religions. The only reason you call Trump's ban a Muslim ban is because those countries already either killed off or chased out christians and Jews. Why would a non-Muslim stay and live under dhimmi status? These muslims are all orthodox- there are no reform mosques. They want sharia law for all and dhimmi status for christians and Jews etc. and the ACLU is happy to give it to them.

JuleeZee

Everyone commenting here, please! Be polite and civilized to each other. We can have different opinions, but should be able to talk about it and listen to each other. And give thanks to the ACLU! Because they take up cases and causes that may not be popular, like the right of hate groups to march and demonstrate, as well as the rights of immigrants. And those of residents and US citizens alike. And that, my friends is the unvarnished truth. Thank you, ACLU for being here for ALL of us!

Sign Up for Breaking News