Chelsea Manning Fights for Her Right to Exist. She Shouldn't Have To

We shouldn't have to keep defending our right to exist.

From inside the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, where she is serving a 35-year prison sentence, that is precisely what convicted Wikileaker Chelsea Manning has been doing – fighting for her existence.

Since first being diagnosed with gender dysphoria in 2010, Chelsea has struggled to be recognized and affirmed by the government, the public, and even some of her supporters, as Chelsea.

In a December op-ed published in the Guardian, she reflected:

We should all have the absolute and inalienable right to define ourselves, in our own terms and in our own languages, and to be able to express our identity and perspectives without fear of consequences and retribution. We should all be able to live as human beings – and to be recognized as such by the societies we live in.

This month, after a year and a half of fighting, including filing over two-dozen complaints, numerous formal grievances, a demand letter, and a federal lawsuit filed by the ACLU, Chelsea Manning finally received some affirmation of her humanity. On February 11, she began hormone treatment for her diagnosed gender dysphoria.

But even with this victory, Chelsea's fight continues.

The government is refusing to let Chelsea grow her hair as other female prisoners are permitted to do. Instead it is forcing her to keep an almost shaved head in accordance with male hair standards.

Meanwhile, in her criminal appeal, the government has refused to honor Chelsea's female identity and is fighting to use male pronouns and her former name in the legal papers for that case – a clear signal that they seek to further dehumanize her as she fights for her freedom. Around the country, countless other transgender women and men in prisons, jails, and immigration detention centers are struggling to be heard, to receive treatment, and to survive unbearable conditions. In other words: to simply exist.

This last week, the Southern Poverty Law Center sued the Georgia Department of Corrections on behalf of Ashley Diamond, a transgender woman who has been denied the medically necessary hormone treatment that she relied on for 17 years prior to her incarceration. In response to her pleas for treatment, Georgia prison officials mocked Ashley calling her a "he-she-thing" and ridiculing her health and safety needs. 

From prison, Ashely writes: "It is amazing how a minor brush with the law has turned into a death sentence. This is about more than just hormone treatment. This is about gross human rights violations. Three years of torture is enough."

Indeed. Three days would be enough, three years is nightmare.

Across the political spectrum, people denounce the worth of trans people to receive the basic medical care we need. Television shows mock our existence and even in the wake of tragedy, media outlets think it permissible to erase our core humanity by refusing to honor our lives and genders in death.

As Ohio-based trans activist Cherno Biko explained:

Our fight is not for equality, it's for liberation and survival. Our bodies are being criminalized and policed to the point of extinction. It is crucial that we channel our energy and resources to our communities' most vulnerable.

While we mourn the many trans women we have lost this year, we must also stand with those trans people living under unbearably violent conditions. Exposed to unthinkable deprivations and degradation, our incarcerated trans brothers and sisters are everyday defending their right to exist.

What an incredibly modest, yet truly brave and resilient demand. Until no more trans people are subjected to the fear of death for being who they are, fighting for trans survival in and out of prisons is our duty and privilege.

From Chelsea to Ashley to the countless whose names we do not know, we see you, we defend you, and we support you.

Learn more about transgender rights and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (11)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

I once said: when our government takes my tax dollars to perform a sex change for a person who is a convicted traitor, then I would likely join a militia.

How does one go about signing up?

Valerie Keefe

Well first you're going to have to find a militia that hates the 8th Amendment. Have fun defending your 'freedom.'

Anonymous

Now, me, I'm a lefty. The Bill of Rights is sacred. However, when a prisoner legitimately convicted of a crime speaks of "liberation," I sort of feel they've blown that right--if indeed it is a right, as opposed to a privilege, when you're asking someone else, U.S. taxpayers, to pay for it--until they serve their sentence.

Anonymous

Why the hell do I have to pay for HIS HORMONE THERAPY? You have a right to consider yourself what ever you want. But the cost should be on you and only you.

Anonymous

Why the hell do I have to pay for HIS HORMONE THERAPY? You have a right to consider yourself what ever you want. But the cost should be on you and only you.

Anonymous

This is satire, right?

Anonymous

Mr. Manning should be in the psych ward for having the delusion that his body is somehow wrong.

Anonymous

"As he ly" (?)

Jean F.

The prior two comments are everything that the ACLU is fighting against. This isn't about giving prisoners expensive sex change surgeries, or about "liberation/freedom" in the common-use sense - it's about giving these women respect *as* women, giving them the medications they require (they don't deny biological women hormones if they require them), and treating them with basic human dignity, especially during court proceedings, where not doing so may prejudice the court to the facts of the case and instead make it about the trans woman's gender, not her possible crime(s). It is about not housing any woman with the opposite sex, even if she has male genitalia. It is about allowing her the same options other women have while incarcerated, not forcing her to conform to a male standard because of cis-gendered bias.

The prior comments seem to imply that once you are imprisoned, you don't deserve to be treated fairly or like a human being with basic human dignity. These people are already incarcerated, already serving their time for the crimes of which they were convicted, already paying their debt. There is no reason to subject them to humiliation, injustice, and indifference for their safety and health on top of that - unless you believe prison exists for the public to exact revenge on a perpetrator, not justice.

Anonymous

Are "prisoner", "convict", "traitor", and "detainee" considered gender-neutral? Does Manning live with males or females in population at Leavenworth?

Pages

Stay Informed