Updated 3/3/2015

Inside the family detention facilities in Karnes County and Dilley, Texas, hundreds of women wait, wondering what the English-only documents say, whether anyone will help them present their asylum cases, and how to care for their children and themselves in the prison-like environment.

Family detention is extremely costly to taxpayers, profits private prison companies, violates due process, and has led to the deaths of children deported to Central America. If the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill passes as is, DHS would receive $362 million to continue to imprison thousands of mothers and children. 

A look into DHS’s new family detention facilities shows why we cannot let this happen.

I spent 12 days meeting with more than 30 detained mothers and children at DHS’s new privately owned and operated family detention centers in Texas. In the roll-out of these facilities, DHS made a significant effort to rebrand them as “family-friendly.” “Detainees” became “residents” who are “housed” rather than “detained” in these massive detention complexes. Even the “guards” became “resident assistants.” Fortunately for the government, few make it out to the remote areas where these facilities are located and, consequently, few see the actual conditions in which these women and children are held. 

From the outside, the family detention center in Karnes looks like a penitentiary, foreboding and impenetrable in the dusty oil fields of Karnes County. Inside this facility run by the GEO Group – a for-profit prison corporation – over 500 mothers and children are detained behind cinderblock walls and sally port doors. They are subjected to restrictions on every aspect of their daily lives, most troublingly on the way they care for their children. Virtually every mother I interviewed told me that her child or children would not eat and that the water tasted so strongly of chlorine that they rarely drank it.

And notwithstanding the intense security measures, the women and children that I interviewed still did not feel safe. One woman reported feeling terrified at night because detainees cannot lock the doors to their cells and that she often awoke screaming, with visions of her persecutors in her room with her. Others reported that their teenage children had become afraid to sleep alone and crawled into bed with their mothers each night.

The physical toll on the detained children was especially alarming.

During one of my first visits to Karnes, I met Maile, a young mother who was desperate to see me – or anyone – who could help her. She needed a lawyer to explain what was happening in her immigration case and why she and her children had been detained for more than two months. But the more pressing issue for her was Elana, her young daughter, who sat listlessly, staring vacantly at the wall with dark circles under her eyes. Elana had changed since their detention and was receding from the world. Large chunks of her hair had started to fall out and no one at the prison knew why. Maile was therefore considering a decision that no mother should have to make: She wanted to know how to get her daughter out, even if that meant being separated from her child. Sadly, Maile was not the only mother who asked me this question.

Being detained at Karnes also impairs the women’s access to legal counsel and ability to care for their children. To meet with counsel, mothers often have to bring their children with them to the legal visitation room. This means that mothers concerned for their children’s emotional health cannot fully describe the dangerous – and often sexualized – persecution from which they fled. These conditions make attorney-client meetings difficult and time consuming. 

It took several interviews with Amalia, a young mother detained at Karnes, to get her full story. At our first meeting, Amalia explained that Lolia, her daughter, was in turmoil after witnessing men repeatedly sexually assault her mother. Since they arrived at the detention center, Amalia had been punished for Lolia’s acting out. We cut our meeting short so that we could continue without Lolia present. However, Lolia came to our second meeting and was clearly very ill. Her eyes looked glassy, her hair was stringy, and she leaned on the table, lifting her head only to cough. Amalia picked up Lolia’s matted hair, explaining apologetically that Lolia had been vomiting as they waited several hours at the medical clinic that morning. Eventually, Lolia’s coughing became so severe that I worried she might choke. 

“Do you want to give her some tea?” I asked. Amalia looked at me blankly and said, “We can’t, we are only given cold water.” When I asked three guards idling in the visitation area for hot water for Lolia, they refused and said that Amalia and her daughter would have to return to the clinic – and presumably wait another few hours. Because Amalia couldn’t give up a rare opportunity for legal counsel, she simply drew Lolia close, rubbed her back, and continued to describe the brutal rape and beatings from which she and Lolia fled. As a mother detained at Karnes, she had little choice but to do this.

In contrast to Karnes, the facility in Dilley, Texas, doesn’t look like a traditional prison. Instead, this sprawling ex-labor camp, encircled by a chain-link fence resembles an internment camp. The Dilley facility, run by the for-profit Corrections Corporation of America through a contract with Eloy, Arizona, is remote and still under construction. Once completed, it will hold 2,400 women and children.

As I approached the trailer where legal visits are held, I saw a young boy. He sat in the foyer, swinging his legs and plaintively asking “Cuando vamos a ir?” – “When are we going to leave?” – in an endless loop as his mother spoke to the guards. 

What is most surprising about the visitation center in the facility is that it looks utterly untouched. I noticed, and continued to note over the course of four trips, the complete absence of attorneys. Unsurprisingly, word spreads like wildfire when there’s any attorney around, and I spoke to more women than planned. I unfortunately couldn’t answer their most pressing question: What do I have to do to get an attorney here?

Nor are there good answers for attorneys who want to help. The Dilley facility is far from any major cities. Attorneys who are able to make the trip will find it difficult to confirm that they can see their client before driving hours to the detention center. My many calls to the main facility number to get confirmation were rarely unanswered.  The facility’s isolation makes the representation crisis acute. If, as DHS intends, Dilley’s population will increase six fold by the end of 2015, it will be yet another example of DHS’s enforcement tactics creating a “crisis squared.”

Bottom line?

There’s nothing “friendly” about how the government is treating children and mothers fleeing brutal violence and seeking protection in the U.S. As Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) said during a Senate floor speech this week,  opposing the new funding for family detention, “Incarcerating women and children fleeing violence runs contrary to our long history as a nation that offers refuge to those most in need.” 

*The names in the blog have been changed to protect the identity of those listed.

Learn more about immigration reform and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (6)
Read the Terms of Use


When is the media going to confront billionaire Red McCombs, Texas car dealer and former owner of the Minnesota Vikings about his ownership of the property leased for the Dilley facility? McCombs is a big supporter of the University of Texas. Is income from this business arrangement funding his donations to UT?


My gut reaction today was to end my affiliation with the ACLU.

If there are problems with our basic prisons, does the ACLU file a lawsuit to get rid of prisons, end law enforcement, and install anarchy from here on in? Or does it take action to reform those prisons?

We all know the the answer to the above question is the latter: to reform, not end the prisons. The ACLU trying to end, not reform, detention centers for illegal immigrants has ZERO to do with American civil liberties. It's irresponsible and un-American.

The ACLU is way out of line by trying to solve the problem in a way which essentially permits illegal immigration. Permitting illegal immigration is not a civil liberties issue; it's an irresponsible political issue supported by a minority of US citizens. If the ACLU can take action to reform, but not end, prisons, why can't it do the same thing here with detention centers!? Among other things, some of the highlights are apparently improving the drinking water and considering locks on doors. Are these things so far beyond the realm of possible improvements and reform that the ONLY possible solution is to flat out allow any and all illegal immigration by women???

This entire article and the corresponding ACLU action behind it makes almost no sense. The big quote at the end: "Incarcerating women and children fleeing violence runs contrary to our long history as a nation that offers refuge to those most in need." Did you even read this quote? First, this is just some arbitrary quote that has no basis in the things we derive our civil rights from (e.g. The Constitution). Is this the ACLU or the Coalition For Irresponsible Feel-Good Actions? Maybe more importantly, in the article, we heard about the abject horror the women said they faced in their home countries. Why are we supposed to drop everything and allow illegal immigration into our country because these women's refuge from that violence in our detention centers is not currently 100% perfect. Until future detention center reform is implemented, is this or is this not still a REFUGE from those horrors they say they were experiencing? Is that not the most important thing from the point of view of those foreign illegal immigrants? Is that not what they wanted most of all?

Worst of all, this politically motivated action by the ACLU is extremely short-sighted. Do you think things will generally get better or worse if the US starts permitting anything-goes illegal immigration? No, think about it! No other country does this. That I know of, no Aboriginal tribe had allowed it. Think about it. There has to be a reason why NOBODY does this. Mexico doesn't. Switzerland doesn't. France doesn't. No one does. And so, considering the probable end result, do you think this is really going to amp up support for the ACLU, civil liberties, or the rule of law?

For all the reasons listed above, this article and the lawsuit by the ACLU (to end, not reform, detention centers) has ZERO to do with civil liberties. It has everything to do with an OFF-TOPIC POLITICAL AGENDA by some of the decision makers at the ACLU to, for better or for worse, support the irresponsible, OFF-TOPIC cause of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. That's all it is.


What about the forefathers that took this land? Was it right for them to take this land thats not thirs? It is right for someone to say in this country "you dont have the right to be here in the U.S" when this is not our land? Native Americans indians and hispanic was and own this land. The forefathers was wrong to take this land.

For God said "Woe to him that buildeth a town with blood, and stablisheth a city by iniquity!


Stop lying to yourselves and letting others lie to you.

These women get free food, free medical care, education, zumba classes, free clothes, free legal help, free chocolate milk and snacks 24/7, flat screen TVs in every room, x-box and Playstation in the day rooms. Kids got free toys for Christmas.

They broke the law, and their only punishment is to wait a few months for processing.

If US citizens got treated like this for breaking the law, I bet you would be just as mad at the Government for treating them too well!


Either this was satire, or you are sick. Utterly disgusting.


Privately owned immigration detention centers are facilities that have been tasked with overseeing hundreds of thousands of immigrants who are in the United States illegally, but these institutions don't know the first thing about overseeing all these people. The US government has a budget deficit, and it is universally accepted that government bureaucracy is never profitable. To combat this, the US government has begun contracting out various tasks including prisons. GEO Group (GEO) and Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) are the two largest private immigration detention centers now operating, and they are raking in hundreds of millions of dollars per year at the expense of the taxpayer, and by putting immigrants second to keep costs low and profits high.

Works Cited
Fialho Christina. "GEO Group Whistleblower Exposes First Amendment Violations, Lack of Officer Training, and Poor Conditions at the Adelanto Detention Center". The Huffington Post.(2016): Web 25 Nov. 2016.
Randles Emma. "The GEO Group acquires LCS Corrections, expanding their reach in Texas". Texas Prison Bid'ness. (2015): Web 25 Nov. 2016.

Stay Informed