For Some Convicted of Drug Offenses, the Punishment Never Ends

Mass incarceration not only destroys families and mangles communities, it slowly erodes our democracy. Too many Americans convicted of nonviolent offenses, such as drug crimes, are punished with excessive prison sentences and then permanently ejected from our democracy through the “civil death” of losing their right to vote.

Criminal disenfranchisement removes massive swaths of society from the democratic process as a collateral consequence of conviction. A striking 5.85 million Americans can’t vote because of a criminal conviction. If all of these citizens populated their own state, it would be the 20th largest state in the country and would have ten votes in the Electoral College.

The distortion of democracy operates through a patchwork of state disenfranchisement laws, varying in severity from state to state. Many disenfranchised citizens live in Iowa, Kentucky, or Florida – the three states with extreme policies of disenfranchising anyone with a felony conviction for life.

These states are among those that also disproportionately suppress the voting rights of African Americans.  In both Florida and Kentucky, approximately one in five African-American citizens is disenfranchised due to a prior conviction. In Iowa, the long-standing system of disenfranchisement, paired with the worst disproportionate incarceration of African-Americans in the nation, resulted in the disenfranchisement of an estimated 1 in 4 voting age African-American men by 2005.

The ACLU and the ACLU of Iowa filed a lawsuit challenging Iowa’s extreme policy of disenfranchising for life everyone with a felony conviction. The Iowa Constitution specifically provides that citizens can be disenfranchised only for an “infamous crime.” The meaning of the word “infamous” in the mid-19th century meant “most vile; base; detestable.”  It captured a concept dating back to ancient Greece where “criminals who had committed certain heinous crimes were pronounced infamous.”

Last year, in an Iowa Supreme Court case, a plurality—three of six— of the justices held that not all felonies are necessarily infamous crimes, but only those kinds of offenses that are serious and have some bearing on the integrity of elections.

In 2008, our client Kelli Jo Griffin pled guilty to a low-level drug crime, was sentenced to probation, and has since served her term of probation. Nonviolent crimes rooted in addiction are not “most vile,” “base,” or “detestable.” They have no bearing on a person’s integrity, much less the integrity of elections. Once Kelli Jo and those like her have completed their sentences, we integrate them back into our society as neighbors, co-workers, and family members. There is no rational or constitutional basis for fencing them out from civic participation for the rest of their lives.

Once a citizen is disenfranchised, Iowa’s discretionary executive clemency policy is the only available route to restoration. But the clemency process is susceptible to the ebb and flow of politics, with some state governors restoring voting rights automatically, and others creating convoluted processes that prevent nearly all restoration.

In 2005, Gov. Tom Vilsack restored the right to vote to citizens who had already completed their sentence, resulting in an estimated 100,000 Iowans regaining their right to vote. He also set forth a process whereby citizens would have their rights restored automatically upon completion of their sentence. Automatic restoration remained in place at the time Kelli pled guilty to a non-violent drug crime.

But in 2011, before she finished her term of probation, Gov. Terry Branstad changed the system so that her rights were not automatically restored; a change Kelli was unaware of once she completed her probation.

Iowa’s extreme policy of punishing Kelli Jo with “civil death” after she completed her probation and turned her life around is dead wrong.  It violates the Iowa Constitution and disfigures our democracy.

Learn more about voter disfranchisement and other civil liberty issuesSign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (1)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous paramedic

For the people who die of the drugs they're sold, THEIR sentence never ends; or more precisely,it terminates in death but that's a neverending consequence for making the mistake of getting hooked on the stuff they buy from the dope person.
Case in point: A guy used cocaine for years, then decided he wasn't going to do it anymore. So he got help, freed himself from the habit and was clean for 2 weeks before he had a massive heart blow-out directly due to a burst dissecting aneurysm in the upper aorta, which created cardiac tamponade (a truly life-threatening condition) and the need for paramedic assistance; the only problem with a burst dissecting aneurysm in the aortic arch (which is in the heart) is that there aren't enough symptoms to alarm the patient, especially when it's misdiagnosed by an idiot doctor 2 days before the patient died from what said EP diagnosed as "heart burn" and sent the patient home to die two days later.
The point is that the guy had already stopped taking the drug, but the damage to the heart was already too severe and he died as a direct result of cocaine use.
The other point is that becoming addicted to drugs like cocaine and heroin (the ones that have the most power to kill the user) is no inconsequential matter. Besides, you can't get addicted to what's not there and I don't see why people who sell heroin or cocaine don't get sentences if not equal to, at least closer to what actual murderers get. I fail to see how "intent to harm" someone DOESN'T exist when you sell heroin or cocaine to a person, unless the drug dealer wants to forever pretend he/she is too stupid to understand when a medical doctor explains that it has the power to kill the user.
But what the hell? They do that with cigarettes and even health care workers who smoke (more do than you think) make junkie excuses for it. I don't see why they should change their tune now and adopt a more responsible tone about it.

Stay Informed