ACLU Condemns Governor Bush's Veto of Civil Rights Bill to Provide Lawyers to Poor
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Sunday, June 20, 1999
WASHINGTON--Today will be remembered as the day that Governor George W. Bush stood at the courthouse door to block long overdue reform of the state's system for providing lawyers for poor people accused of crime.
By vetoing a major civil rights bill unanimously passed by the Texas Legislature to effect that reform, Governor Bush says that poor people should be treated like second—or even third—class citizens in our criminal justice system.
The governor's action is neither compassionate nor conservative—for what could be more compassionate than ensuring that poverty does not guarantee a prison sentence, and what could be more conservative than adhering to the Constitutional guarantee of the right to a fair and speedy trial.
For more than a decade, lawsuits, press reports, and investigations conducted by the State Bar of Texas have repeatedly documented instances of deplorable representation throughout the state. According to the Spangenberg Group, the nation's most experienced investigators of indigent defense, the state's system for providing lawyers to poor people who are accused of crime is the only one of its kind in the entire nation. Under the Texas system, state judges—who run for office every four years—spend local tax money on any lawyer they choose for each individual case. It is nothing less than cronyism run rampant.
At the behest of Senator Rodney Ellis, the Texas Legislature has considered proposals to reform indigent defense at least since 1993. In 1998, Texas's House of Representatives conducted an interim study that recommended reform. This year, Senator Ellis again introduced reform legislation. Following testimony at a public hearing, the Senate Criminal Jurisprudence Committee unanimously approved the bill. Next, the entire Senate and House passed the bill without objection by a member of either political party.
The ACLU deplores today's decision by Governor Bush. Because of his veto, each time a lawyer sleeps during his client's trial, each time a lawyer meets his client for the first time 15 minutes before a hearing only to urge the client to plead guilty so that the judge can clear his trial calendar and the lawyer can turn a quick profit, each time a poor person waits months in jail before first seeing a lawyer, and each time a judge demands a campaign contribution from a lawyer in exchange for appointments, it will be on Governor Bush's record, and should be on his conscience.
Learn More About the Issues in This Press Release
-
TennesseeMar 2025
Criminal Law Reform
Smart Justice
Just City, Inc. v. BonnerJust City, Inc. v. Bonner
Shelby County (Memphis), Tennessee, historically set cash bail in criminal cases without stopping to ask whether people would be able to bail out. This practice unnecessarily detained people who could not afford to pay for release, but who would otherwise return to court and live peacefully in their communities. The ACLU Criminal Law Reform Project negotiated a historic settlement with Shelby County to end this practice. In retaliation, the Tennessee legislature passed HB 1719, which prohibits judges from considering an arrestee’s ability to pay when setting bail. This law is unprecedented. Our lawsuit seeks to enjoin Shelby County officials from enforcing it. -
New York Supreme CourtFeb 2025
Smart Justice
Free Speech
NYCLU v. New York State Office of Court AdministrationNYCLU v. New York State Office of Court Administration
This case in the New York Court of Appeals (the highest New York state court) asks whether a government agency can conceal guidance that it issues to judges on how to apply the law in adjudicating cases. A few years ago, news reporting brought to light that a New York administrative agency has a practice of issuing such guidance to state court judges without disclosing it to the public. Because the agency's guidance informs how judges decide cases—with important implications for people’s rights—the New York Civil Liberties Union requested access to it under New York’s Freedom of Information Law. The agency denied the request, so the NYCLU sued. The NYCLU and the ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative are arguing that the public is entitled to the guidance and that there is a strong public interest in the transparent administration of justice. -
OregonJan 2025
Smart Justice
State of Oregon v. Adrian FernandezState of Oregon v. Adrian Fernandez
This case asks if ORS 138.105(8)(a)(A)—which removes an appellate court’s authority to review a “sentence that is within the presumptive sentence prescribed by the rules of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission”—precludes appellate review of a state constitutional challenge to a within-guidelines criminal sentence. The ACLU’s State Supreme Court Initiative, alongside the ACLU of Oregon, filed an amicus brief in support of defendant Fernandez, who seeks to challenge his sentence under the Oregon Constitution’s proportionality guarantee. The amicus brief argues that interpreting the statute to preclude review of Fernandez’s challenge would raise grave constitutional concerns under Oregon’s separation of powers and privileges and immunities doctrines. -
Press ReleaseJan 2025
Smart Justice
ACLU Applauds President Biden’s Decision to Grant Clemency to Nearly 2,500 PeopleACLU Applauds President Biden’s Decision to Grant Clemency to Nearly 2,500 People
WASHINGTON – President Biden announced today that he will commute the sentences of nearly 2,500 people impacted by the failed war on drugs – a war that devastated communities by incarcerating people for unjustly long sentences. These extreme and unjust sentencing policies of the past disproportionately impacted communities of color, particularly through the discriminatory 100:1 and subsequent 18:1 sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. This announcement comes after President Biden granted commutations to 37 people on federal death row, and 1,500 people who were released to home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic under the CARES Act. With the nearly 2,500 commutations announced today, President Biden has now granted commutations to more people than any president in our history. Cynthia W. Roseberry, director of policy and government affairs at the ACLU’s Justice Division, had the following statement: “We are thrilled with President Biden’s decision to commute nearly 2,500 sentences today. We have long advocated for the use of clemency to heal communities by returning loved ones to their families and to address the harms of our broken criminal legal system. This decision reflects the growing recognition that harsh drug sentencing laws tear communities apart by incarcerating people who otherwise would benefit from second chances and supportive services. Today’s decision, and the other acts of clemency over the last several weeks, are major steps towards remedying the shameful criminal legal policies of our past and building a more just future. “While we celebrate this progress towards justice, we know there is more we must do to repair the harm of the war on drugs and push for a criminal legal system rooted in fairness and humanity. The disparity between crack and powder cocaine remains 18:1, despite the substances being chemically identical. Congress must act swiftly to pass the bipartisan EQUAL Act, which would end the disparity once and for all.” Learn more about the ACLU’s Redemption Campaign here: https://www.aclu.org/news/topic/the-redemption-campaign-embracing-clemency