Obama Administration Should Not Institutionalize Indefinite Detention For Guantánamo Prisoners, Says ACLU

December 22, 2010 12:02 pm


Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States

Group Responds To Proposed Executive Order

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org

WASHINGTON – According to news reports, the Obama administration is considering an executive order that would establish a periodic review process for Guantánamo detainees who are being held indefinitely without charge or trial. The American Civil Liberties Union opposes the indefinite detention of prisoners at Guantánamo, some of whom have been held in U.S. custody without charge or trial for as many as eight years.

The following can be attributed to Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office:

“It is impossible to evaluate the review process in the proposed executive order without seeing it, but we have serious concerns about any order that would institutionalize indefinite detention for Guantánamo detainees. Where credible evidence exists against Guantánamo detainees, they should be charged and prosecuted under our criminal justice system, which has a successful record of prosecuting terrorism suspects and is the only way to provide the fair and reliable outcomes that Americans deserve.”

There have been hundreds of successfully completed terrorism trials in the federal courts, both before and after 9/11.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy policy.

The Latest in National Security

ACLU's Vision

The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

Learn More About National Security

National Security issue image

The ACLU’s National Security Project is dedicated to ensuring that U.S. national security policies and practices are consistent with the Constitution, civil liberties, and human rights.