www.aclu.orgJOIN THE ACLUTAKE ACTIONABOUT US
ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office American Civil Liberties Union Homepage Blog of Rights Homepage Support the ACLU
Jul 30th, 2010
Posted by Sarah Preston, ACLU of North Carolina at 3:24pm

Reforming a System of Assault on Students' Rights

For the first time in 25 years, the North Carolina. legislature has passed much-needed reform regulating how local school districts use corporal punishment. Back in 1985, the legislature passed a law allowing schools to decide whether or not to use corporal punishment – as opposed to being required to do so. That led to big improvements, and by the start of the 2009-10 school year, 69 districts out of 115 had banned the practice. Yet according to a public records request conducted by Action for Children and the ACLU-NC, kids in North Carolina are still subjected to corporal punishment thousands of times a year - more than 1,400 times during the 2008-2009 school year alone. Unfortunately, legislators have simply protected the system, refusing even to require annual reporting on the use of corporal punishment from school districts.

Shockingly, there’s not even a state – or federal – law protecting children with disabilities from being subject to corporal punishment at school, a practice that was well-documented in the groundbreaking reports Impairing Education and A Violent Education, co-authored by the ACLU’s Human Rights Program and Human Rights Watch.

There does seem to be some progress, though. At the federal level, Congress is finally beginning to take note of this destructive practice, and things are already changing. Due in large part to the advocacy of the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office, on June 29, 2010, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) introduced the "Ending Corporal Punishment in Schools Act," H.R. 5628. This bill would ban the use of corporal punishment in public schools and private schools that serve students receiving federal services. It is a huge step forward in eliminating this form of punishment in schools.

And here in North Carolina, after years of hearing from civil liberties and children’s advocates, legislators finally started to listen when they realized that children with disabilities – who could be physically and developmentally harmed by this kind of treatment – are not protected. It may not seem like a huge step, but for the first time, the N.C. House and Senate unanimously supported a bill to regulate corporal punishment against students with disabilities. The new law creates a mechanism by which parents of students with disabilities can prevent their children from being subjected to corporal punishment in school and requires extensive reporting from school districts that use corporal punishment. Until this law was enacted, schools were only required to keep track of how many students were punished physically in school and even that data was not correlated or reported to anyone at the state level. Now schools have to report to the state the race, grade level, whether the child had a disability, and why corporal punishment was used on an annual basis. Because of this change, students with disabilities in all 23 districts that use corporal punishment will be protected and parents, advocates, school districts, and the state will more easily be able to monitor how corporal punishment is being used across North Carolina.

What’s more, support for a total ban on the use of corporal punishment is building in North Carolina. Since the bill protecting children with disabilities went into effect on Friday, July 23rd, three districts have reported banning corporal punishment and a fourth has reported that they created an “opt-out” for all children so that any parents can remove their child from being subject to corporal punishment. More districts are set to vote on a local ban. A coalition of organizations like the ACLU-NC that are concerned about child safety and students’ rights continues to build momentum so that very soon North Carolina can join the 30 other states that ban the use of corporal punishment in schools.

Tags: Disability Rights

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

3 Responses to "Reforming a System of Assault on Students' Rights"

  1. Anonymous Says:

    I bthought the goal was to protect children with disabilites? What does the race of the child have to do with the issue? Are more minority children disabled?

  2. Einstein Says:

    The crux of the matter is that kids simply have no rights. What you describe is one symptom of that problem in one state of the USA.

  3. Curmudgeon Says:

    Glad to see NC trying to join the 21st Century. Problem with corporal punishment: it demonstrates to children that violence is an acceptable way of solving problems. Is that a lesson we want to be teaching them?

Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
 

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map

Statistics image