Categories
Join Us At:
|
The Other Super Bowl: Speech vs. SpeechBy now, you've caught wind of the fact that, during this weekend's Super Bowl, CBS plans to air an ad featuring University of Florida quarterback Tim Tebow and his mother talking about the circumstances of Tim's birth. Focus on the Family has sponsored the ad, and the underlying message is reported to be anti-abortion (no one has actually seen the ad). Pundits and advocates of many stripes have been weighing in. Some criticize CBS for its last minute game change — in prior years CBS's policy was supposedly not to air "issue ads" during the big game; that's apparently why, in 2004, they rejected a United Church of Christ ad promoting its open-door policy for gays and lesbians. Others give CBS credit for opening up the airways (if you have a few million dollars, that is) and making room for something other than over-produced beer and car commercials. How open this policy is, however, is up for discussion: the press also reports that while CBS accepted the Focus on the Family ad, it closed the door on a gay dating service spot. Our colleagues at Planned Parenthood have taken a different approach. They decided to go head to head with Focus on the Family and put out their own issue ad featuring two athletes — Sean James and Al Joyner — celebrating sports and family. They speak respectfully of Mrs. Tebow and the decisions she's made for her family, and they honor the women in their lives who have taught them that "women can make the best decisions about their health and their future."
Now, that's meeting speech with some powerful speech. Unfortunately, Planned Parenthood's ad won't be broadcast during the Super Bowl, but with a little help, as many people could watch it as will watch Focus on the Family's. Share the link with your loved one's and Go Saints! Go Colts! Go Women!
We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.
One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites. We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published. Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section. 6 Responses to "The Other Super Bowl: Speech vs. Speech" |
|
|
© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 |
Feb 5th, 2010 at 4:25pm
Does anyone else note the irony of cheering the killing off of potential women in the name of women's rights?
Feb 5th, 2010 at 4:39pm
I just tried to link this article to my facebook page and it's not taking. Any idea why not?
Feb 7th, 2010 at 5:59pm
PERSONAL MATTER. Can we just leave that to the person -- the woman/girl who is pregnant, to decide what is best for her and the unborn child??!!??
IT'S A PERSONAL MATTER!!!!
Feb 10th, 2010 at 5:55am
well... nice. conveniences. don't raise people just to make them work and pay taxes.
Feb 15th, 2010 at 8:21pm
A personal matter? I thought it was a medical matter! Can't have it both ways.
Feb 21st, 2010 at 11:00am
Sometimes it is a medical matter Maggie. Sometimes it is a personal choice. Yes, we can have it both ways because it is a matter of both ways like it or not.