Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood 
Reviewing the legal standard by which courts consider abortion restrictions and whether laws regulating abortion must protect women's health. DECIDED
| SLIDE SHOW |
 |
| Photographs from the November 30 Press Conference |
| NEWS Supreme Court Ruling Recognizes Protections for Women's Health (1/18/2006) Court Urged to Protect Women's Health (11/30/2005) |
| FEATURES Answers to Key Questions About Ayotte C-SPAN covers Ayotte |
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood et al. began in 2003 as a challenge to a New Hampshire law restricting teenagers' access to abortion. The law requires doctors to notify a parent at least 48 hours before performing an abortion for a teenager. The law includes no exception for medical emergencies.
In reviewing this case, the Supreme Court will consider two questions: one, must an abortion restriction, not just New Hampshire's, include a medical emergency exception, and two, can doctors and women continue to challenge dangerous abortion restrictions and ask the courts to strike them down before they can harm women?
