California Can Reduce the Number of Police Shootings. Here’s How.

Police in California have a problem with deadly force. Last year, police shot and killed 162 people in the state, half of whom did not have guns. California departments have some of the highest rates of killings in the nation. In a 2015 report, for example, the Guardian identified central California’s Kern County as the place where a member of the public is most likely to die at the hands of police.

Those figures are alarming, but even more shocking were the sentiments expressed by Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood in a recently-unveiled video from 12 years ago. During a meeting with the county’s Detention Officers Association, Youngblood told the audience that it is better financially for the county when his deputies kill someone rather than injure them.

“If we cripple them we get to take care of them for life, and that cost goes way up,” he told the union members. “You know what happens if a guy makes a bad shooting on somebody — kills them?” Youngblood asked the audience. “Three million bucks, and the family goes away.”

Sheriff Youngblood’s comments show what families and communities affected by police violence already know: There is little recourse for victims of police shootings and little incentive for officers and police departments to change.

This is unacceptable. And yet, under California law, it is perfectly legal for a police officer to shoot and kill someone, even if other alternatives are available and even if the killing wasn’t necessary to keep officers or the public safe. Officers are rarely held accountable because the law allows police to use deadly force whenever an “objectively reasonable” officer would have done so under the same circumstances, and courts have said that police don’t have to use the least amount of force possible for their conduct to be “reasonable.”

The results?

Police officers who kill people are seldom prosecuted and, so far as we know, seldom even disciplined. Between 2005 and 2016, only two police killings carried out during an arrest were deemed unjustified out of nearly 1,200 reported by local police departments, according to California Department of Justice data.

It’s time for California to adopt a new, commonsense standard that recognizes the value of preserving human life. Police officers should be prohibited from using deadly force unless necessary, instead of whenever “reasonable,” and they should be required to use “de-escalation” tactics to defuse a situation or other alternatives to deadly force where possible.

Assembly Bill 931, authored by Assembly Member Shirley Weber, would enshrine that rule in state law and help ensure that police use deadly force only as a last resort. The bill would also require that decision makers from police chiefs to juries look at officers’ entire conduct leading up to their decision to pull the trigger. That way, officers can be held accountable for gross negligence when they escalate a situation that ends with someone dead.

These requirements are becoming more and more common across the country. A number of individual police departments have already implemented variations of AB 931’s provisions, including the FBI, and some have adopted all of them. The San Francisco Police Commission recently approved a use of force policy with a necessity standard. The policy requires that officers use de-escalation techniques and alternatives to deadly force. And when a deadly shooting does occur, officers are judged on their entire conduct leading up to the shooting, not just when they pull the trigger.

Several departments have adopted similar use of force policies under the guidance of the U.S Department of Justice, including Seattle and Chicago. Two major law enforcement groups, the Police Executive Research Forum and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, have released model policy guidelines that call for higher standards than just reasonableness, including de-escalation and holding officers accountable for creating circumstances that justify deadly force.

While some police departments have adopted these policies, AB 931 would make California the first state in the country to make these best practices law for all law enforcement agencies. This would be a significant shift, and the data show that these policies work. Departments with tighter limits on when police can use force kill fewer people. At the same time, those departments see, on average, lower rates of officer assaults and similar crime rates to departments with looser standards. Reducing police deadly force helps everyone’s safety.

We’ve seen far too many tragic and unnecessary shootings, and they won’t stop until we change the law. Join us in this fight to save lives and hold police accountable.

View comments (20)
Read the Terms of Use


You are advertising that the ACLU fights for everyones rights, I beg to disagree with you! I can't remember the last time I observed the ACLU defending " freedom of speech", especially "right leaning" speech. The violence resulting from our last Presidential election was appalling, also appalling was the non-presence, of the ACLU. Not stepping up to the plate, is an indication, to me that! your organization has lost touch with it's roots!


You can't remember anything because you don't know what you are talking about. One obvious and big case that they took up was Kessler's and his [neo-nazi far-right] protesters’ right to demonstrate at Emancipation Park in Charlottesville in 2017.

"Charlottesville officials originally denied organizer Jason Kessler a permit for a march protesting the removal of a Robert E. Lee Confederate statue from a local park. In response, the ACLU filed a lawsuit against the city, citing the national organization’s long-held belief to uphold the rights of free speech for all."

Dr. Timothy Leary

How can this be? California is considered to be a liberal state. How can there be so many police shootings there? You would expect this from a conservative state like Texas, Arizona or Mississippi. You know, the redneck states. I guess they liberally shoot people in California.


Your a fucking idiot

Dr. Timothy Leary

Once again it takes one to know one.
F.Y.I. The reason the the ACLU is now moderating comments here is because of people like you responding to my comments in such vulgar fashions.

Scott Hill

This is idiotic. The simple and obvious solution is to disarm them. A guaranteed way to reduce the shooting is to take the guns away. Simple, and 100% certain effectiveness.


who is them?


Not going to happen. This bill has been strongly opposed by the vast majority of police departments and basically your supporting something that basically screams cops have to wait to be shot at 1st before they can defend themselves. This will lead to more police officers being killed in the line of duty but clearly you and the rest of this anti police trash don't seem to care about that. And considering the police shortage in California at this time, this is going to make it a lot worse and crime will continue to rise. Stop blaming police officers for everything because nearly all shootings involving a cop would never occur if people would just obey the law and follow officers commands, so way to prove to be nothing but liberal trash.

John Perfetto

Anonymous for somebody that feels so strongly about this and as such a vulgar person if you actually believe what you're saying why don't you post your name


The amount of crime is going to sky rocket in the coming decades.


Stay Informed