Former Officer's Guilty Verdict for Killing Walter Scott Is the Exception, Not the Rule

Police officer Michael Slager shot and killed an unarmed Black man, Walter Scott, in 2015, and it was all caught on video. Today he was sentenced by a federal judge to 20 years behind bars for violating Scott’s civil rights. While this instance of accountability in a police killing is heartening, the fact that it is a surprising result tells you what you really need to know about police reform. The accountability of police to the communities they serve is still elusive in many places, and nonexistent in some.

Officer Slager was shown shooting Scott in the back while Scott ran away. Yet even with that video evidence, his first trial in state court resulted in a hung jury. Slager’s pleading guilty to federal charges and now being sentenced for the murder of a Black man is the exception to the rule. Usually there are no charges. Or there is no conviction. There are myriad cases, from Alton Sterling in Louisiana to Philando Castile in Minnesota, where video evidence was not enough.

Police officers often invoke the “fear” they felt in the moment. The fear they, as armed, powerful and body-armor-wearing officers, felt in the presence of a Black person running away, or selling loose cigarettes, or driving a car, or playing with a toy gun. Officer Slager invokes that fear, claiming that Scott was reaching for his Taser.

The fear that is not addressed is the fear felt by Black and Brown people who are routinely subject to police discrimination and brutality. This is a fear that needs to be addressed with nationwide police reforms that include more comprehensive training that allows the use of force only when necessary and promotes de-escalation techniques to keep people and officers safe during their interactions.

While the Slager case is a victory, it is not a solution. The ACLU of South Carolina, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, along with local NAACP offices and community organizations have repeatedly asked the federal government to step in and review the North Charleston Police Department, which has a recorded history of racially motivated policing. Such a review could address implicit bias and end racialized policing, and help to ensure that those who are charged with protecting communities fulfill that duty.

The ACLU of South Carolina along with other community agencies has been working to obtain an independent review of the North Charleston Police Department’s patterns and practices when it comes to dealing with minority communities. Numerous town hall meetings have been held in order to obtain data from the residents of North Charleston about their interactions with the police.

In sentencing Slager, Judge David Norton said he “acted out of malice and forethought.” That Walter Scott was another Black man gunned down by police matters. We need police practices in South Carolina to change and we need these same policing reforms across the nation. We know that these reforms must come from within communities. This is especially true now, with a Justice Department that has shirked oversight of law enforcement. The police need to know that the people are watching, and that they will not tolerate police criminality that results in the killing of people they are supposed to serve.

View comments (8)
Read the Terms of Use

roll the ball

Thank you for sharing this is awesome blog thanks a lot for giving me this great opportunity to write on this.please visit our website I assure you that it will be very useful for you
- roll the ball
- impossible game

Julians

Great review Thanks
forskolin reviews

A. Wyatt Mann

Why are these Negroids always having trouble with the police? The Mongoloids are a minority in America too and they don't seem to be having all these problems.

C Moran

Try studying some Black and American history. Among other things, you'll find that today's police are yesterday's slave patrols. Read, study, research. Know Your History.

A. Wyatt Mann

Why did the slaves need to have patrols? Didn't they have enough work to do already?

Anonymous

The report by U.S. Department of Justice's "Civil Rights Division" on Ferguson, Missouri touched on a huge problem that needs more focus: allowing cities to either annex or revenue-share with the surrounding suburbs. It not only contributes to the creation of poor inner-cities but turns some suburban police departments into revenue-officers instead of safety officers - through no fault of the rank & file police officers.

It's good police officers following orders in a dysfunctional system driven by financial incentives instead of safety incentives.

In this example: if Ferguson were part of the St. Louis Police Department or policed by the Missouri State Police (for very small localities) it may have prevented many of these problems by minimizing police interactions in the first place.

Most large cities in America became large cities because of their proximity to transportation infrastructure used for trade and commerce - access to waterways, railroads or auto-crossroads. The "fall line" of rivers, where deep-water ships could travel, is where most major American cities are located.

Industry and bedroom communities grew up around these cities. The affluent suburbs surrounding American cities are primarily wealthy due to their proximity to the city. For example: if Fairfax County, VA, suburb outside of Washington, DC, could be physically relocated to Southwest Virginia - it would be one of the poorest counties in America. It's only rich due to it's proximity to Washington, DC and major trade routes.

If taxation for suburbs were based on "commuting-miles" to the nearest city, it would help poor inner-city schools and inner-city infrastructure and services. Today in most American cities, there could be two next-door neighbors, living a mile from downtown, paying significantly different tax rates because one resides inside the city limits and the other neighbor in the suburban county. This creates an incentive for residents to move out of the city harming it's tax base.

The net result is that affluent suburbs are not adequately revenue-sharing with their nearby city government. On the other extreme, poor suburban places like Ferguson, Missouri that really can't afford their own police department, then prey on their own poor citizens to make up revenue - creating more police contacts with citizens which results in more shootings.

Solving the tax revenue-sharing problem and allowing cities to annex more of the suburbs is a big part of the problem. The U.S. Department of Justice's "Civil Rights Division" created an excellent report on Ferguson that all Americans should read.

Anonymous

I totally cherished this book. On the off chance that you have any enthusiasm for the U.S. Preeminent Court, Brown v. Leading group of Education, or what life may have been similar to in the Washington, DC zone paving the way to Brown v. Leading group of Education, don't pass up a major opportunity for perusing Unanimous Verdict. Despite the fact that a totally unique story from "The Help" by Kathryn Stockett, I think the individuals who delighted in "The Help More Detail https://www.dissertationhub.co.uk will appreciate this novel as well

mittal

I get minecraft gift card http://asuskr.com/free-minecraft-gift-card-generator.php

Stay Informed