Police ‘Command and Control’ Culture Is Often Lethal — Especially for People With Disabilities

When West Milwaukee police killed Adam Trammell, a Black resident of the city, he was unarmed and alone in his locked apartment, just taking a shower. The police came because a neighbor had called them and reported that Trammel was acting “oddly.” Police arrived to do a “wellness check,” already knowing Trammell had schizophrenia. Trammell was not wanted for a crime. He was not a threat. But he wound up dead at the hands of law enforcement.  

Footage from a police body camera shows what happened.

Police called out to “Brandon” — the wrong name. They got no answer, so officers broke down his front door. They found Trammell showering in the bathroom, pulled back his shower curtain, and told him to come out of the shower. When he did not respond immediately, they tased him. Trammell screamed, fell down in the shower, and passed out. As soon as he came to, police again began demanding that he exit the shower. When he sat there rocking, they tased him again. He screamed again. Over the next 30 minutes, the police tased him 18 times. 

Trammell died on his living room floor.  He was 22. 

When police know — or should know — that they are interacting with a person with a disability, police have a legal obligation to proceed in ways that take into account the person’s disability. Most such changes are simple: recognize that it may take time for the person to understand what is happening, create a calm environment, have one person communicate simply and clearly, allow time for the person to respond to questions or instructions, and exercise patience.      

Such steps are called “reasonable modifications” under the Americans with Disabilities Act. They are legally required for people with disabilities. But, as with so many accommodations, implementing these practices across the board would benefit everyone — people with disabilities, the general public, and police officers themselves.

In Mr. Trammell’s case, police did the opposite, escalating the situation beyond measure. And now local officials will not hold the officers accountable. The Milwaukee County district attorney, John Chisholm, decided not to charge the police officers with any crime. The chief of police, Dennis Nasci, has said he does “not see any discipline coming down for what they did.” 

The killing of Mr. Trammell is part of a horrific pattern. In 2018 alone, police have shot and killed 64 people with mental health disabilities. This January, Alejandro Valdez was suicidal and threatening to kill himself. The police shot and killed him. In February, Orbel Nazarians was suicidal and threatening himself with a knife. The police shot and killed him. In March, Jihad Merrick was suicidal and pointing a gun at his head. The police shot and killed him. In April, Benjamin Evans was making suicidal comments. Police shot and killed him. 

The data indicates at least 25 percent of all police killings are people in a mental health crisis. And as with police killings in general, those killed by police while in mental health crises are disproportionately people of color, just as Adam Trammell was. But we can address this problem, so that everyone involved in a mental health crisis walks away alive.

First, police — who carry guns and are hired and trained to enforce criminal laws — should not be the first responders for people who are having a mental health crisis. Our first choice should be mental health professionals. They are trained and equipped to interact with people in a crisis.

There are examples of this at work in select cities, where local government has chosen to employ mobile crisis patrols with people specifically trained to work with, deescalate, and help people in crisis. Eugene, Oregon, has implemented a program that dispatches teams of crisis counselors and non-police first responders — EMTs, paramedics, or nurses — to respond to emergency mental health crisis calls instead of armed officers.

Barring the availability of mobile crisis patrols, when no firearm is involved, firefighters or EMTs would be better choices than police to do ‘wellness checks’ or to engage with people in a mental health crisis. These responders do not come equipped with a gun or Taser, and their training includes interacting with people who are in crisis.

Second, for the situations when police officers actually must be involved, they need different training — not additional training. It shouldn’t be a one-week training to learn how to work with people with disabilities or a way for police to get more resources while desperately needed community services — including mental health treatment — go without. We need different police training altogether from the ground up, starting at the police academy.

The Police Executive Research Forum agrees. 

In their groundbreaking report, “30 Guiding Principles on Use of Force,” they highlight the need for different training as well as a different policing culture. Nationally, police academies spend an average of 58 hours on firearm training but a mere 8 hours on de-escalation or crisis intervention. The PERF report explains that police culture emphasizes a “command and control” approach to every situation. But they point out that — absent an active shooter or a crime in progress — such an approach is likely to endanger lives. Taking time, assessing the situation, and responding calmly and appropriately are not just better for the public, it is better for the officers as well.     

Third, we need accountability. When police unlawfully take a life, district attorneys need to file charges. If they do not file charges, we need to vote them out. Police chiefs need to provide training, guidance, and policies so that officers are trained to assess situations, de-escalate problems, and keep themselves and the public safe. Police chiefs need to remove officers who react with violence instead of calm, whose fear or bias provokes irrational and dangerous responses to people in crisis and people of color. 

The crisis of police killings will not abate if officials refuse to enact these simple, obviously needed solutions. People with disabilities will continue to have their rights violated, and they will continue to die, if police can enter their homes, drag them from their showers, and kill them without consequence.

View comments (26)
Read the Terms of Use

Outraged

People, this is "The Thin Yellow Line", your police out of control like a violent gang covering their own asses. Please pass it on and keep repeating "The Thin Yellow Line" in your commentaries.

Anonymous

Well you remember the police use to call people with shaved heads "skin heads" and targeted them as bad people? Well look at 90 % of the cops are shaved"skin heads" hopped up on steroids and other things...All cops need to be hair texted for drugs. Legal and illegal drugs when there is use of force automatically. And throughout the year.

Dr. Timothy Leary

Aren't they supposed to have men in white coats and a net come and straitjacket these people?

Anonymous

I agree with you that the police shouldn't be the first responders when it comes to mental illness. However, you left a whole lot of information out. According to the left-leaning CNN, the person who called for the wellness check said Trammell was in the hallway naked and might be having a psychotic break. Also, he wasn't lying in the bathtub getting tased - he was fighting the police as they were trying to get him out of the building. We have search engines, you know. We can double-check to see if you are giving us all the information and some people will.

Anonymous

U can't always trust the papers or internet but aclu does a tremendously good job of getting their facts straight and they are 100 % correct on this article and what needs to be done to protect citizens and citizens with disabilities! I back the aclu.

Anonymous

If the police busted the door down and came in while u were taking a shower and said for u to get out and then kept taxing you I'm sure anybody would be trying to get away from them as they dragged you out of your house. Its natural response by any person disabled or not!!#

Anonymous

U can't always trust the papers or internet but aclu does a tremendously good job of getting their facts straight and they are 100 % correct on this article and what needs to be done to protect citizens and citizens with disabilities! I back the aclu.

Anonymous

The 'anonymous' to whom I am responding seems to be kind of confused (CNN=left-leaning?) and implying that the
police were justified in this case? :P

Anonymous

You're begging for people to jump to the conclusion Trammel was behaving aggressively (and this was the catalyst for the way the police behaved). I hope people are aware that you should never expect aggression or other misbehavior from people with mental illnesses just on the basis that they have them, even if he was in a crisis. Do not assume that a psychotic break entails aggression or a threat to your safety. Think of the consequences!

DMP

Police in other wealthy nations receive training that focuses heavily on de-escalation, human behaviour and containing the situation. Why can't police in the US?

Pages

Stay Informed