Cribbs Ringer v. Comal Independent School District
Certiorati Briefing
A petition for a writ of certiorari is a brief that asks the Supreme Court to review a lower court’s ruling, either from a federal appellate court or a state’s court of last resort. A Brief in Opposition urges the Court not to review the case, and is filed by the party that prevailed in the lower court.
What's at Stake
A group of Texas families are challenging a 2025 Texas law, S.B. 10, that requires public schools to conspicuously display a state-selected, Protestant version of the Ten Commandments in every classroom. Nearly 50 years ago, the Supreme Court overturned a similar Kentucky law because it violated the First Amendment. After an appellate court ruled that S.B. 10 does not violate the Constitution, the Baha’i, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, and nonreligious families involved in the lawsuit are asking the Supreme Court to hear their case and to block the law. The First Amendment prohibits states from forcing scripture on public-school students, and it guarantees families — not politicians or the government —the right to guide children’s religious belief and education.
Summary
In 2025, Texas lawmakers enacted S.B. 10, which requires all public elementary and secondary schools to display a Protestant version of the Ten Commandments selected by the legislature. As mandated by the law, the displays must be at least 16 by 20 inches in size and must be hung in a “conspicuous place” in each classroom. The Ten Commandments must be written largely enough that students can see them no matter where they are seated. In other words, the displays are designed to be unavoidable for students. From kindergarten through twelfth grade, the government will impose this religious doctrine on children for nearly every hour they are in public school.
A group of Texas families with children in public schools across the state filed a federal lawsuit challenging S.B. 10 in response to their school districts displaying or preparing to display Ten Commandments posters in classrooms despite a federal ruling that the state-mandated displays violate families’ religious freedom and the separation of church and state. The families suing in Cribbs Ringer v. Comal Independent School District are Jewish, Christian, Hindu, Baha’I, and nonreligious; some families include parents who are reverends. The families allege that forcing the Ten Commandments on their children in every classroom will pressure the children to conform to the state’s favored religious beliefs and interfere with parents’ right to guide their children’s religious instruction.
In their lawsuit, the parents sought an injunction requiring their school districts to take down the displays and prohibiting them from posting new ones. The district court agreed, ruling that the Ten Commandments law likely violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Nearly 70 years of Supreme Court precedent back the district court’s ruling, including a milestone 1980 Supreme Court decision in a lawsuit brought by the ACLU that struck down a similar Kentucky Ten Commandments law.
Nevertheless, the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed the district court in April 2026. The appellate court upheld S.B. 10 and cleared the way for the Ten Commandments to be posted in the plaintiff children’s classrooms. Together with the families in a similar lawsuit challenging S.B. 10, Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District, the families in Cribbs Ringer filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in August 2026. They have asked the Court to hear both cases, reverse the appellate court’s rulings, and protect their families’ religious freedom.
Legal Documents
-
08/17/2026
Joint Petition for Writ of Certiorari
-
05/29/2026
Order Granting Motion for Summary Reversal
Date Filed: 05/29/2026
Court: Appeals Court (5th Cir.)
Download Document-
11/18/2025
Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -
10/27/2025
Plaintiffs' Combined Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
10/20/2025
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction -
09/23/2025
Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction -
09/22/2025
Plaintiffs' Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
Date Filed: 11/18/2025
Court: District Court (W.D. Tex.)
Download DocumentDate Filed: 10/27/2025
Court: District Court (W.D. Tex.)
Download DocumentDate Filed: 10/20/2025
Court: District Court (W.D. Tex.)
Download DocumentDate Filed: 09/23/2025
Court: District Court (W.D. Tex.)
Download DocumentDate Filed: 09/22/2025
Court: District Court (W.D. Tex.)
Download DocumentPress Releases
Texas Families Urge U.S. Supreme Court to Take Case on Texas Law Requiring Ten Commandments in Public School Classrooms
Multifaith Texas Families Condemn Fifth Circuit Decision Upholding Mandatory Display of Ten Commandments in Public-School Classrooms
Judge Orders Texas School Districts to Remove Ten Commandments Displays in Response to New Lawsuit Filed by Families
Texas Families File New Lawsuit to Stop Public School Districts From Displaying Ten Commandments