Smart Justice issue image

Hudson v. Michigan

Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Status: Closed (Judgment)
Last Update: January 11, 2006

What's at Stake

Reviewing whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence seized following a violation of the "knock-and-announce" rule. DECIDED


The Fourth Amendment requires the police to knock and announce their presence before executing a search warrant, except in exigent circumstances. The police in this case violated that rule. The issue is whether evidence seized during the search should be suppressed under the exclusionary rule.

Press Releases

Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts Donate now