United States v. Adams

Beginning in the summer of 2025, DOJ sent a series of escalating letters to Kentucky election officials demanding the state's complete, unredacted voter registration list. When Kentucky declined to hand over voters' most sensitive personal data, DOJ filed suit in February 2026 — one of at least 29 nearly identical cases brought against states with officials who refused to comply.

Extensive public reporting and sworn court filings reveal that the requested data is not simply intended for routine election law enforcement. Rather, officials have acknowledged plans to run the data through cross-agency matching systems to identify alleged noncitizens on state voter rolls. Those efforts have already been shown to produce significant numbers of false positives, incorrectly flagging U.S. citizens as ineligible. The initiative has been shaped in part by outside "election integrity" activists who previously used similar techniques to mount mass voter challenges before the 2024 election, all of which were ultimately rejected.

The League of Women Voters of Kentucky, the New Americans Initiative, and two individual Kentucky voters — both naturalized citizens who fear their registrations could be wrongly targeted — have moved to intervene as defendants to safeguard voter privacy and ensure that the voices of affected Kentucky voters are heard in court.