ACLU Hails Federal Appeals Court Ruling Delaying Production of Tennessee’s Anti-Choice License Plate
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org
NASHVILLE – The American Civil Liberties Union today hailed a federal appeals court decision delaying Tennessee’s production of an anti-choice specialty license plate while the organization seeks U.S. Supreme Court review of a ruling upholding the plate as constitutional.
“Tennessee must ensure that all residents can express their views equally,” said Hedy Weinberg, Executive Director of the ACLU of Tennessee. “The state cannot be in the business of limiting some speech while allowing other speech.”
The legislature twice rejected an amendment that would have authorized a “Pro-Choice” specialty plate. The law in question makes a “Choose Life” license plate available to motorists for an annual fee of $35 over and above the basic cost of registering a car in the state. Fifty percent of all funds raised, after expenses, will go to a private anti-choice organization called New Life Resources.
In March, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the ACLU and ruled that the anti-choice plate did not violate free speech rights. Earlier this month, the ACLU announced that it would appeal that decision to the U.S. Supreme Court and also asked the federal appeals court to postpone Tennessee’s production of the plate while the appeal is under consideration.
“We are pleased that the court prevented the production of the plate while the case is under review,” said Brigitte Amiri, a Staff Attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project. “We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will agree with our position that by only allowing an anti-choice plate, Tennessee has effectively silenced a viewpoint it disagrees with.”
Plaintiffs in the case include the ACLU of Tennessee, Planned Parenthood of Middle and East Tennessee, Inc., and three individuals. Lawyers on the case include Julie Sternberg, Carrie Flaxman, and Amiri with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project; Roger Evans of Planned Parenthood Federation of America; and Susan L. Kay, the ACLU of Tennessee Legal Committee Chair.
Today’s case is ACLU of Tennessee v. Bredesen, #03-1046. To learn more about the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project: www.aclu.org/reproductiverights/index.html
Stay Informed
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy policy.
The Latest in Reproductive Freedom
-
New Lawsuit Argues Combined Restrictions on Health Care for Trans Youth and Abortion Violated State Constitution
-
ACLU Comment on Fifth Circuit Argument in Medication Abortion Case
-
This Week, Anti-Abortion Extremists Showed Us Who They Really Are
-
Vice President Kamala Harris Joins Rally for Reproductive Rights at Howard University
ACLU's Vision
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About Reproductive Freedom

The ACLU works to ensure that every person can make the best decision for themselves and their family about whether and when to have a child without undue political interference.