ACLU Welcomes Supreme Court's Decision to Hear Guantánamo Challenges

June 29, 2007 12:00 am


Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States


LEARN MORE
> New Conservative Majority Rolls Back Fundamental Rights and Closes Courthouse Doors (6/28/2007)
> ACLU Summary of the 2006 Supreme Court Term
> Challenging Government Torture and Abuse
> The Military Commissions Act and Habeas Corpus
> Five Years at Guantánamo

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: media@aclu.org

NEW YORK – The American Civil Liberties Union welcomed today’s decision by the Supreme Court to review an appeal by Guantánamo detainees, who are seeking the right to challenge the legality of their detention in federal court. The Court had previously declined to hear the appeal in April, but reversed course in an order issued today on the final day of the Supreme Court Term.

The following statement can be attributed to Steven R. Shapiro, the ACLU’s national Legal Director:

“Today’s action by the Supreme Court is yet another sign of growing concern with the Bush administration’s failed Guantánamo policy. Even those who participated in that policy are now openly criticizing it. Having already lost three times in the Supreme Court, the administration continues to argue that it has the right to detain hundreds of people at Guantánamo indefinitely without any meaningful judicial review. The time has come for the Supreme Court to put an end to this system of injustice.”

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy policy.

The Latest in National Security

ACLU's Vision

The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

Learn More About National Security

National Security issue image

The ACLU’s National Security Project is dedicated to ensuring that U.S. national security policies and practices are consistent with the Constitution, civil liberties, and human rights.