Ohio "Supermax" Prison Case Goes to Trial Monday; Focus Will Be on Brutal Conditions at Penitentiary
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CLEVELAND – A week-long trial begins Monday in a class-action lawsuit brought by more than 300 inmates over brutal conditions at the “Supermax” prison in Youngstown.
The case, filed last January on behalf of the inmates by the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio and the New-York based Center for Constitutional Rights, broadly challenges many aspects of incarceration at the Ohio State Penitentiary, the only super maximum – “Supermax” — security prison in the state.
“This prison was supposed to house the worst and most violent inmates in the state,” said ACLU of Ohio Legal Director Raymond Vasvari, “but that seems never to have been the case. Who gets in, who stays in and for how long is all a matter of luck. That is more than unfair, it is unconstitutional.”
A year of litigation and intense negotiations have already produced substantial changes at the facility, Vasvari said. In late 2001, for example, U.S. District Judge James Gwin issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the incarceration of seriously mentally ill inmates there.
The public portion of the trial will begin in Akron on Monday at noon. Before the start of the trial that morning, Judge Gwin will make a special trip to the prison to hear opening statements, view the facilities and give inmates the opportunity to see the beginning of the trial.
Thereafter, the case will be tried every day from 8:00 am through 5:00 pm until completed. The trial will be held in the fifth floor courtroom of the Federal Courthouse at 2 South Main Street in Akron.
Among the issues to be addressed at the trial are whether conditions at the prison are so different from other state prisons as to give prisoners the legal right to protest their transfer there. If so, the next question at trial will be whether the process the state uses to assign prisoners to the Supermax — and to keep them there for years on end — is fair.
Attorneys for the inmates said that the process is an inconsistent maze of complex regulations that produces arbitrary results, keeping some inmates in the Supermax despite strong evidence that they have reformed their conduct. Such procedures violate the constitutional right to due process of law.
The case is Austin et al. v. Wilkinson et al., filed in the United States District Court Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. ACLU attorneys in the case are legal director Vasvari, staff counsel Jillian Davis, Staughton and Alice Lynd, who are of counsel, and Michael Benza, volunteer attorney. CCR attorneys are Bill Goodman, legal director, Jules Lobel, cooperating attorney, and Terry Gilbert, cooperating attorney.
The legal complaint is online at http://archive.aclu.org/court/wilkinson.pdf
A news release on the filing of the case is online at /node/
Every month, you'll receive regular roundups of the most important civil rights and civil liberties developments. Remember: a well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny.
The Latest in National Security
ACLU Acknowledges Improvements to DOJ Racial Profiling Policy, But Says Far More is Needed
ACLU Applauds Court For Allowing Case Challenging FBI’s Wrongful Prosecution of Chinese American Physics Professor To Move Forward
Shen v. Simpson
Chinese Immigrants Sue Florida Over Unconstitutional and Discriminatory Law Banning Them From Buying Land
The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.
Learn More About National Security
The ACLU’s National Security Project is dedicated to ensuring that U.S. national security policies and practices are consistent with the Constitution, civil liberties, and human rights.