When Police Use Disappearing-Message Apps, It’s Not Just Bad for Accountability — It’s Illegal

In a disturbing trend, government officials and police departments have been thwarting public oversight by using communications apps that automatically delete messages.

The latest example comes from Southern California, where an investigation by Al Jazeera and the ACLU of Southern California revealed last week that the Long Beach Police Department was using an app called TigerText to send self-erasing messages. The department’s effort to subvert transparency appears to have been intentional: Supervisors were instructing officers to use the app whenever they wanted to keep potentially damaging information secret — including in cases of police killings.

Email: Update on TigerText Secure Messaging App

The LBPD’s decision to systematically destroy communications is an outrageous violation of California’s public records laws and the legal obligation to preserve records that could come up both in criminal cases and civil rights lawsuits against the department. And this decision — made by the police department in the city ranked the 13th deadliest in the nation for police killing — is also a glaring example of the mindset of impunity that prevails in some police departments.

Sadly, an interlocking web of structural, legal, and political forces has made meaningful accountability for police misconduct a chimera. Government use of disappearing message technologies only presents yet another roadblock on the way to ever being able to police the police.

When police officers kill a member of the public, they receive an immense amount of resources from their local police unions, including rapid legal assistance. Although police departments technically investigate complaints of officer misconduct, the inquiries are often locked away from public view and result in a staggeringly low number of complaints being sustained against an officer. When presented with clear police misconduct, prosecutors often lack the independence or will to charge officers. Legal rules governing how officers may use force allow enormous discretion to kill. And even when internal personnel proceedings occur, they are often unfair and biased in favor of letting even reckless officers keep their jobs. This is all in spite of an avalanche of research showing that the criminal justice system operates in a fundamentally racist fashion.

Government use of disappearing messaging technologies only adds to the problem. When police officers use self-deleting messages, they diminish the public’s ability to ever fully know about and challenge the government systems they are subject to. It’s only because of a whistleblower that the LBPD scandal ever came to light. After receiving a tip earlier this year, the ACLU filed a public records request seeking information about LBPD’s use of TigerText. In response, we received documents confirming that the police department was using the disappearing-message app for “criminal investigations and confidential communication.”

While the LBPD’s use of TigerText was kept secret for years, after news of it broke last week, the fallout was swift, reflecting the severity of the scandal. The same afternoon, the department announced that it would suspend use of the application. The ACLU subsequently sent a letter demanding that the department permanently stop using disappearing-message apps and calling for an investigation into its use of TigerText. The department responded by announcing an independent review by an outside firm, and Los Angeles County prosecutors that handle police misconduct are also investigating.

How Long Beach got to this point provides a compelling reminder of the difficulty of attaining meaningful accountability from the government. While it may come as no surprise that government actors have attempted to hide their operations from public scrutiny throughout history, today, apps like TigerText, Snapchat, Confide, and Wickr take the possibilities to the next level. Through those services, users can set messages to automatically delete after a certain amount of time. The disgraced former governor of Missouri, Eric Greitens, used Confide to trade messages with his staff in violation of public open records laws, resulting in a lawsuit. In 2017, Trump administration officials reportedly downloaded the same application to exchange messages.

As the ACLU explained in a Freedom of Information Act request seeking more information about the use of such applications by federal employees, such apps can help protect privacy and enable free speech when private individuals use them — but when government actors rely on them to conduct government business, it means the public is unlawfully kept in the dark.

The public needs to know how widely police officers use these apps to evade accountability — and we are working to find out. Through our public records request to LBPD, we learned that that department was spending about $10,000 annually for TigerText. Officers from the department said in public statements that they are aware of other departments that use similar technology, though they would not disclose specifics.


Police departments are notoriously secretive about the technologies they purchase and use on the streets, but we hope public records requests will continue to uncover the government’s misuse of disappearing-message apps. In the meantime, companies like TigerConnect, the company behind TigerText, should disclose what government agencies they have already sold this feature to, and government actors should discontinue its use. Self-destructing messages have no place in a transparent government.

View comments (17)
Read the Terms of Use


Ask any African-American civil rights leader, that survived the Jim Crow era, and they will tell you that the vast majority of (not all) local prosecutors simply aren't designed or equipped to prosecute local police corruption. Local prosecutors simply have too many conflicts of interest and are subject to greater negative consequences to their careers. It should be mandatory, by law, that FEDERAL prosecutors lead all police corruption investigations, with greatest culpability on police chiefs and top management.


Based on years of observation, it appears that all commenters, on this website, simply wanting commonsense police reforms will be harased and stalked by their local/state police departments. In other words police departments illegally penalizing perfectly legal First Amendment activity using taxpayer dollars and their condtitutional authority. Police chiefs and officers that participate in this illegal practice are violating the Federal Criminal Code: Title 18 US Code 241-245, Title 42 USC 14141, Title 42 USC 1983 and the First Amendment. Most of these criminal violations can carry federal prison time for police officers, other government officials and even some private citizens as well. Jeff Sessions has a duty to enforce these federal statutes.


I hear Jeff Sessions has a duty to Donald Trump, not the federal statutes. If Sessions hesitates, Trump would fire him with a snap of his fingers.

Isn't it terrible that the left is trying to scandalize the Kavanaugh hearings, totally ruining his life and future? Kavanuagh's integrity is nothing like Comey or McCabe requiring Trump to have their careers destroyed. Why Trump didn't annihilate Tillerson too everyone wants to know, wasn't he just like Rosenstein?


We have to dissect and contextualize "Police Corruption" in order to understand it and help solve it. Like those that serve in the military or other brave public servants, most of these officers are good people most of the time. Most probably have good intentions and their goal is to serve the general public, sometimes risking life and limb for complete strangers. Since they are "Good Guys" 90% of the time, it's entirely counter-productive to portray them otherwise. The problem seems to be that many Americans, especially those living in middle class and affluent suburbs, see the 90% "good side" 100% of the time. Americans living in places like Harlem/Washington Heights see the 10% "bad side" of police practices about 100% of the time they interact with police. There is also a problem with police violating 14th Amendment rights (part of an officer's oath of office) - an officer may perform a "Stop & Frisk" search in Harlem/Washington Heights for marijuana but not perform that illegal search on Wall Street or Long Island. Since only the poorest citizens are subjected to these searches, it results it more arrests and convictions in poor neighborhoods. In this example, experts say marijuana usage is about the same in both poor and more affluent neighborhoods. If police chiefs would simply acknowledge that this 10% dark side exists in what the "Good Guys" do, that would help minimize many of these problems in community policing. They need to show the 90% side to the poor neighborhoods as well. It's also the law under the U.S. Constitution and federal "color of law" criminal statutes!


The problem is that we mostly see the ten percent of “bad cops” in the news and those cops NEVER get punished for their crimes and the 90 percent of the “good cops” will shield them behind the “Thin Blue Line.” American cops are loyal to themselves and their unions first and foremost, not the people they are supposed to “protect and serve.” Heck, legally they don’t even have to do that anymore. While I know this will never happen in the U.S. I’d like to see American police go back to the basics of Robert Peel style policing like in Britain, present more in the community, accountable to the public, and the standards of use of force being something other than “draw gun and keep shooting until the ‘suspect’ is lying in a pool of blood.”


It's incongruous that non-government officials should be able to have conversations without them being recorded forever for posterity and government officials shouldn't. There's a different between formal and informal communication.

This article deals with the policy of official use of an app that deletes official police communication records, not with officers using the app privately for sexting or planning surprise prties or something. Those are different things entirely.

Dr. Timothy Leary

What's the LBPD? Is that a new version of the LGBT?


Read the article! Or were you trying to be cute? That's the Long Beach Police Department .


Read the article.


Stay Informed