
Oasis Family Birthing Center et. al. v. Alabama Department of Public Health
What's at Stake
A group of midwives and doctors filed a lawsuit in state court challenging actions by the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH), which imposed a de facto ban on freestanding birth centers throughout Alabama. Birth centers provide midwifery care to low-risk pregnant patients, a model of care that is proven to be safe and beneficial to patients. Despite that, ADPH took actions that forced one center to abruptly shut down in 2023 despite a perfect safety record, and then passed onerous regulations that would require birth centers to meet hospital-like standards, preventing birth centers from operating in the state. After hearing oral argument in late September 2023, the Circuit Court of Montgomery County granted our request for a Preliminary Injunction on September 30, 2023, preventing ADPH from refusing to timely license freestanding birth centers that comply with nationally-recognized safety standards for birth centers while litigation continues. As a result of the injunction, our plaintiffs Oasis Family Birthing Center in Birmingham and Alabama Birth Center in Huntsville are now open and providing much-needed care to their communities.
Summary
The lawsuit comes after ADPH created significant, unjustified barriers to the operation of birth centers that provide midwife-led care by asserting that all such birth centers require a “hospital” license, even though they exclusively provide midwifery care to low-risk patients using a model of care that is safely provided in out-of-hospital settings across the country. ADPH’s onerous, hospital-like regulations for birth centers are clinically unnecessary and would make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for them to operate at all.
The lawsuit brings several statutory and constitutional claims against ADPH, including:
• ADPH lacks the authority to require birth centers to obtain a hospital license because midwife-led birth centers do not constitute “hospitals” under Alabama law.
• Even if ADPH has licensing authority, its unreasonably burdensome and unnecessary regulations violate Alabama law and the constitutional rights of midwives, pregnant patients, and individuals who own and operate birth centers.
ADPH’s unlawful actions are exacerbating an already severe crisis for pregnant Alabamians or those seeking to become pregnant. The state has the third highest maternal mortality rate in the nation, with Black women making up a disproportionate share of maternal deaths. Alabama also has the sixth highest infant mortality rate in the nation, with Black infants making up a disproportionate number of these deaths. One factor playing into this concerning trend is the growing number of maternal health deserts in the state. More than two-thirds — or 43 out of 64 — counties in Alabama have little to no access to maternity care. To address this disparity, midwives and providers are working to open birth centers to provide safe and welcoming environments for low-risk patients to access much-needed prenatal care and birthing services, especially for those who have decided that giving birth at home or in a hospital is not the right place for them to deliver, or impossible due to the lack of maternal care available in their area.
The lawsuit, Oasis Family Birthing Center et. al. v. Alabama Department of Public Health, was filed in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court in Montgomery by the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Alabama, and Bobby Segall of Copeland Franco on behalf of Oasis Family Birthing Center in Birmingham, Heather Skanes, M.D., Alabama Birth Center in Huntsville, Yashica Robinson, M.D., the Alabama affiliate of the American College of Nurse-Midwives, Jo Crawford, CPM, and Tracie Stone, CPM.
Legal Documents
-
08/08/2023
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Oasis Family Birthing Center v. ADPH -
09/30/2023
Preliminary Injunction Order, Oasis Family Birthing Center v. ADPH -
10/03/2023
Supplemental Preliminary Injunction Order, Oasis Family Birthing Center v. ADPH -
01/19/2024
Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief -
02/29/2024
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -
02/29/2024
Defendants' Partial Answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint -
04/22/2024
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -
06/04/2024
Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss -
01/15/2025
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement on Claim One -
02/05/2025
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Claim One -
02/05/2025
Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgement on Claim One
Date Filed: 08/08/2023
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 09/30/2023
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 10/03/2023
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 01/19/2024
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 02/29/2024
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 04/22/2024
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 06/04/2024
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 01/15/2025
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 02/05/2025
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentDate Filed: 02/05/2025
Affiliate: Alabama
Download DocumentPress Releases
Alabama Court Blocks De Facto Ban on Birth Centers in Case Brought by Midwives and Doctors
Midwives and Doctors File Lawsuit Challenging Alabama’s De Facto Ban on Birth Centers