In February 2019, the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s emergency powers declaration to secure funds to build a wall along the southern border. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition. The lawsuit argues that the president is usurping Congress’s appropriations power and threatening the clearly defined separation of powers inscribed in the Constitution.
Although Congress refused to give in to the president’s demands for a border wall and imposed spending restrictions to protect wildlife areas and the integrity of border communities, the president claimed emergency authority to divert billions of dollars that Congress had appropriated for other purposes to build his wall. The president, all but admitting that the emergency declaration was not necessary, claimed that he “didn’t need to do this” but wanted to construct a wall “much faster” than Congress was allowing.
If border wall construction is carried out as directed under the president’s emergency declaration, it would harm communities living along the border, endanger wildlife, and have devastating impacts on the environment.
The Southern Border Communities Coalition brings together 60 organizations from California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas to promote policies and solutions that improve quality of life in border communities. The hyper-militarization of the border wall, accelerated by the president’s declaration, would increase anti-immigrant sentiment and marginalize communities of color even further.
The Sierra Club is a national organization with 67 chapters and more than 3.5 million members and supporters dedicated to protecting and restoring the quality of the natural and human environment.
The lawsuit argues that the president’s declaration and diversion of funds violate core constitutional principles and multiple laws and statutes, including the 2019 Appropriations Act, the Constitution’s Presentment Clause, and the constitutional principle of separation of powers.
The 2019 Appropriations Act passed by Congress explicitly rejected President Trump’s $5.7 billion demand for a border wall and forbade construction in certain areas, including carve-outs for wildlife areas. Further, the president violated the Presentment Clause by signing the 2019 Appropriations Act but then rejecting it by declaring a national emergency to build more of a border wall than Congress permitted and faster than Congress allowed.
The emergency declaration also violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires agencies to conduct environmental assessments and consider the harm to wildlife before proceeding with construction.
The lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of California, and the defendants also include the secretaries of Defense, Homeland Security, and Treasury.
Follow The Case
Appeals Court (9th Cir.)
District Court (N.D. Cal.)