Some Schools Need a Lesson on Students’ Free Speech Rights

School is back in session, and that means school administrators may be back to surveilling students on social media and unjustly disciplining them for what they say on it.

We’ve seen both of these troubling trends before. And in today’s era of inspiring student activism, they may become all the more prevalent. Moreover, experience shows that discipline for student expression is not always applied evenhandedly, and can be invoked to silence youth of color and other marginalized students.

Fortunately, the First Amendment protects student speech. While public schools can regulate student speech that substantially disrupts the functioning of the school, as the Supreme Court held in the landmark 1969 case Tinker v. Des Moines, students do not lose their First Amendment rights simply by virtue of walking into school. Nor do they give up their right to speak out outside of school simply by virtue of being a student. To the contrary, outside of school, students enjoy essentially the same rights to protest and speak out as anyone else.

In the last five years, more than 100 public school districts and universities have hired companies to monitor the social media of their students. At least one district asked a surveillance company for alerts on any post mentioning “protest” or “walkout.” Another surveillance company offered to help public schools monitor “behavioral information” about specific individuals, including keeping tabs on their conversations with others.

Know Your Rights: Students’ Free Speech Rights

Much like other forms of surveillance, government monitoring of students’ social media accounts — which often includes surveillance of their lives outside of school — can have a disproportionate effect on people of color.

For example, after an Alabama town contracted with a consulting firm to watch students’ social media, more than 85 percent of the students expelled due to social media posts in a one-year period were students of color, even though more than 60 percent of the town’s population is white. As the Southern Poverty Law Center reported, one student was expelled for wearing a sweatshirt depicting her murdered father, and another was expelled for posting a photo of himself “holding too much money.”

Elsewhere, the ACLU has challenged school districts that disciplined students of color over photographs taken while dancing at home, with the schools alleging that these constituted “gang-related messages.”

This disproportionate effect is perhaps not surprising, given that some school officials around the country have disciplined students of color who, in an effort to criticize and push back against the racist speech of classmates, reposted it. One school in North Carolina suspended two Black students for reposting a video of a white classmate using a racial slur while criticizing gun control laws. Similarly, an Ohio school suspended two students for reposting a classmate’s racist remarks on Snapchat.

Schools are meant to teach the Constitution — and follow it. That means respecting equality and freedom of speech. And when students speak out on the political issues of the day, it should lead to engagement, not wrongheaded punishment.

View comments (15)
Read the Terms of Use


Schools monitor children's use of social media outside of school hours because they get sued for allowing social media bullying if they don't. Quit setting up EXPENSIVE, catch-22s, for our public schools. I completely agree that schools should have no say over what children say and do off school grounds and outside of school hours - but that goes for all children regardless of what they are doing.


Yeah and if the object of the social media bullying happens to be a queer/transgender, guess who is gonna be involved in that suit against the school? THE ACLU


I’m quite confused by your comment? The article offered many examples unrelated to bullying, that shows a pattern of schools using monitoring to restrict students rights to free speech. Setting up alerts for “walkout” or “protest” has nothing to do with bullying. Of course it’s not every single public school doing this, but darn sure enough to draw attention and cause concern. There is no catch-22 here. Schools aren’t held accountable for “allowing” cyber bullying, especially in regards to this article, which is speaking to what students post online during non-school hours.
I’m most confused by the last bit, you completely agree that schools should have no say, “but that goes for all children regardless of what they are doing.” Taken in the context of your whole comment, it especially sounds as though you’re advocating students being free of consequence when bullying other students online?? What goes for all children? And why is this a “but”?


When children are not at school they are the responsibility of their PARENTS. If that fails, they can still be held accountable by the Justice System. School's should not be responsible for anything children do when their parents are supposed to be watching them.

Dr. Timothy Leary

It has now become a game of beat the media.


Lawsuit wise, it probably would be cheaper if schools beat the media until they ran away.


Doesn’t this infringe upon the UDHR?


Freedom of speech is for of age citizens. Children should be seen and not heard. That is the problem with our society today. Parents do not take responsibility for teaching their children respect and manners. Instead they teach them nothing but insolence through their actions and voices. No wonder our country is failing. It’s time parents grew up and teach their children how to become upstanding members of society rather than fascists and anarchists.


No. Freedom of speech does in fact apply to minors.


Literally the opposite. You are so immature children would un-ironically do a better job.


Stay Informed