In Rhode Island, Some Schools Think They Have the Right to Spy on Students With School Laptops

Students today have a lot to worry about: passing that pesky biology class, getting into college, and mastering the perfect Snapchat filter, to name just a few examples. However, there is one concerning matter that many of them are not aware they should be worried about: their school spying on them while using their school-loaned laptop.

Most Rhode Island school districts participate in “1-1” programs — in which third parties provide free laptop devices to students for the school year. While that should be a good thing, the details are a bit more complicated. We recently found out that most of the state’s participating schools give themselves the ability to remotely spy on their students through these loaned devices.

We published our findings early this month in a report titled “High School Non-Confidential: How School-Loaned Computers May Be Peering Into Your Home.” The report found that more than 60 percent of Rhode Island school districts today participate in the 1-1 program. It also discovered that a majority of those districts allow school officials or administrators to remotely access the device — while a student is at home, without their knowledge, and without any suspicion of misconduct. We know from an outrageous Pennsylvania case, in which school administrators were found to have activated webcams to spy on students in their homes, that this obvious privacy concern is not hypothetical. Yet only six districts specifically stated in their policies that they would not remotely access the webcams or microphones of devices distributed through the programs. 

Consider how creepy it is for any school official to be able to remotely and secretly peer over your shoulder while you’re in the safety of your home. And webcams aren’t the extent of the threat. Without proper policies, schools can also access the keystroke and browsing histories of students participating in the programs. George Orwell’s “1984” is standard required reading in schools. Administrators would do well to revisit it.

We also found that many schools equate the blanket access to computers that their policies allow to their right to inspect student lockers. This is a problematic analogy because lockers are actually in school at all times. School-loaned devices are designed for portability — and students are encouraged to use them at home. In addition to the obvious Fourth Amendment implications of such a search, there are First Amendment concerns as well. Unlike a locker, a search of a computer can reveal tons of documents, files, messages, social media activity, and other classic elements of “speech.” We’ve also seen that invasions of privacy chill free speech and free association — both critical to development and effective learning.

We’re not against school-loaned devices, but the policies that govern these programs need some work when it comes to civil liberties. In denying students their right to privacy, we are limiting their learning and teaching them that they are all suspects in the eyes of authority. Additionally, it shouldn’t be the case that wealthier students who can afford to use their own devices get to keep their privacy, while other students are forced to take the device and surrender their privacy — or keep their privacy, turn down the device, and hurt their education. No one’s privacy should be conditioned on their socioeconomic status.

There are ways to fix this. The ACLU has written a model bill that any state can adapt to protect its students. In Rhode Island, a bill that largely mirrors the model bill has been introduced in the state legislature. It would limit when an administrator or third party can remotely access devices to instances where there is reasonable belief that misconduct, as spelled out in school policies, took place, or if a warrant is present.

No child should have to trade away privacy in exchange for access to cutting-edge technology. Schools should be taking the lead in protecting their students

View comments (37)
Read the Terms of Use

Hillary Rotten ...

Don't spy on me when I poo-poo. It stinks you know. BTW I'm not a gay-gay. Yet!!

John Galt

No, you're probably not a gay-gay, as you say, just a dum-dum and a loser.


Education system is always give a chance to all learners to create a best career and grow fast. Nestor University is one of the best institute to grow your knowledge and experience.


While peering onto bedrooms is obviously a crime regardless of who supplies the computer, as far as privacy of data on the computer, the children should learn the same you an adult learns about what you do on a company supplied computer.
Two completely different issues mentioned.


*learn the same lessons you as an adult learn


If an individual did that to a child they would probably charge them with some sort of sex offense. This is very creepy and wrong. I will sue and prosecute if I ever find out they are doing it to my kid. If those are legal deadends someone will get hurt.


Education in its general insight is a kind of learning in which the data, capacity, and inclination for a get-together of people are traded. Visit our Site

Accused terrorist

Coventry detectives listen to the microphones of innocent citizens using anti terror equipment the received from the federal fitment.

. They also arrest people for Jesus related offenses. No constitutional rights there at all.

City of Warwick administrators diagnose employees as crazy then deny health care for injuries to a firefighter injure fighting a fire.

They also accuse employees of threatening to kill Warwick Rhode Island fire chief Edmund Armstrong, his secretary and a bunch of firefighters with an Ak47 if they complain about being harassed. The Warwick police do the arresting.

Basically. The city of Warwick and the states AG, fully expect me to get weapons and kill others or myself. Either way those Warwick fire chiefs should be charged with attempted murder.

We do not have civil liberties or civil rights here. There are civil privileges and they are useless unless you have the human rights to qualify as a person. I am not a person. I am an accused terrorist, crazy too.

Personally, I hope someone does go there and do to them what they accused me of, they deserve it.


Maybe America's greatest lawman, Robert Jackson, believed the most dangerous government action was when officials violate "search & seizure" restrictions without a judicial warrant. Since the school is a government entity this clearly meets this most dangerous trespass against citizens. Jackson warned:

"Uncontrolled, search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary government"

If Jackson were alive today, he might give this warning to state run Fusion Centers trolling Facebook trying to fit people to future crimes or teachers spying on their students - without judicial warrants.

Jackson's warning also applied to his international experience as a Nazi prosecutor. The reason search & seizure is so dangerous is that it leads to other abuses when nosing into one's private life and difficult to provide sufficient oversight for judges since victims can't prove legal standing in court.


terimakasih atas artikelnya yang bermanfaat
sabun amoorea
Vip Smule
nu amoorea
harga amoorea


Stay Informed