Ignore the Drumbeat of Doom, the NSA’s Call Records Program Didn’t Stop a Single Terrorist Attack

Do you hear that? It's starting.

The predictable drumbeat of dire warnings about what will happen if portions of the Patriot Act – the post-9/11 law being used to conduct controversial NSA dragnet surveillance – are allowed to expire on June 1 has already begun.

James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, issued what is likely to be the first of many vague warnings from the intelligence community on Monday. Faced with the expiration of the part of the Patriot Act that allows the bulk collection of information about Americans' phone calls, Clapper brought out the favored hypothetical of the surveillance hawk: An unspecified attack will occur, which would have been prevented if Congress had reauthorized the dragnet collection of Americans' phone calls.

"If that tool is taken away from us... and some untoward incident happens that could have been thwarted if we had had it," Clapper said, "I hope that everyone involved in that decision assumes the responsibility."

There's just one problem with this particular bit of emotional blackmail, however. The pesky, rather inconvenient fact is that the government's mass surveillance programs operating under Section 215 of the Patriot Act have never stopped an act of terrorism. That is not the opinion of the NSA's most ardent critics, but rather the findings of the president's own review board and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. This program has had over a decade to prove its value, and yet there is no evidence that it has helped identify a terrorism suspect or "made a concrete different in the outcome of a counterterrorism investigation."

In less than three months, Section 215 will expire unless Congress takes action to extend that authority. As that deadline approaches, we will be hearing more from folks in the intelligence community who would like to see the program continued indefinitely.

Congress would do well to remember that this is a program that is sweeping up vast amounts of data on innocent Americans in violation of their constitutional rights. It's also one that, despite the rhetoric, has not succeeded in making us any safer. In fact, even Director Clapper has expressed support for some reform of Section 215.

The drumbeat of doom is only going to get louder between now and June. But it can't drown out the truth. Surveillance reform is urgently needed to rein in out of control government spying and to restore our rights.

Learn more about the NSA and other civil liberty issues: Sign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

View comments (5)
Read the Terms of Use

Anonymous

A cell phone can be stopped from tracking if it is placed in a Faraday Cage. A Faraday cage is a metal or conductive envelope that completely surrounds the electronic device and stops signals from going into or out of the cage.This can be accomplished by making a pouch out of a metallized ie conductive fabric. Search youtube for detracktor for a demonstration.

Anonymous

A cell phone can be stopped from tracking if it is placed in a Faraday Cage. A Faraday cage is a metal or conductive envelope that completely surrounds the electronic device and stops signals from going into or out of the cage.This can be accomplished by making a pouch out of a metallized ie conductive fabric. Search youtube for detracktor for a demonstration.

HawkAtreides

But if we stop sacrificing children to the rock, the tigers will come back!

Anonymous

I'm for privacy, but still, this is a good tool for tracking terrorists.

Heck, they should record all of our phone calls as long as there is a strong framework in place for protecting access to such a system in a warrantless fashion. The NSA is too powerful and is a massive waste of money and operates without. I wouldn't be surprised if they track those in the government, house, senate, judicial, executive branch, etc... who are trying to limit their power.

Anonymous

Especially not the attack that killed my husband and daughter's dad, which came AFTER Bush was warned 6 times that SOMEthing was about to happen.
His response: "OK you covered your ass," now let me get back to my golfing.
And I VOTED for him. TWICE.
I didn't know THAT when I voted for him. I didn't know ANY of this stuff that Eric died for AND was denied his own body to confirm his death.
I say f-- all that noise and that Eric deserved to live more than some of them. Especially some of them in the BUSH Administration, particularly one who's still not even sorry they tortured people (and ruined the opportunity of getting a solid conviction on the one who IS guilty), was even disgusting enough to think we should still be doing it.

Stay Informed